Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Billionaire Faceplants LIVE on 70% Tax Rate (Original Post) rsacamano Jan 2019 OP
heather long looked pretty ridiculous there too. Kurt V. Jan 2019 #1
+1 2naSalit Jan 2019 #3
I don't know if "Dell" did start a foundation or not. Or if he "gave more money" than a 70% tax. usaf-vet Jan 2019 #2
And that's the point that we aren't supposed to figure out 2naSalit Jan 2019 #4
Exactly! usaf-vet Jan 2019 #6
If a 70% marginal tax rate would help level the income inequality then maybe there wouldn't be such chowder66 Jan 2019 #5
This is how you privatize zentrum Jan 2019 #7
Also Exactly! usaf-vet Jan 2019 #10
Foundations from the rich are just crumbs for the masses. Crowman2009 Jan 2019 #8
I like the look skydive forever Jan 2019 #9

usaf-vet

(6,181 posts)
2. I don't know if "Dell" did start a foundation or not. Or if he "gave more money" than a 70% tax.
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 10:59 AM
Jan 2019

If he did as he said that is great. BUT the bigger question is what about all the billionaire and millionaires that HOARD their money. The I've got mine FU crowd.

Nothing forces them to use their money to help others. A 70% tax rate would help solve the hoarding IMO.

2naSalit

(86,559 posts)
4. And that's the point that we aren't supposed to figure out
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 11:06 AM
Jan 2019

along with, yes, the higher taxes do work better for the greater good, but they aren't into that at all because... greed.

chowder66

(9,067 posts)
5. If a 70% marginal tax rate would help level the income inequality then maybe there wouldn't be such
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 11:58 AM
Jan 2019

a need for "foundations".
Maybe people would have more to give if they had more in their pocket ...or maybe people wouldn't be in a situation that they need to rely on a foundation. Foundations have been started by people with less money than these top earners so it's not like they couldn't still create them or support them.

On edit: I read your post and these are just some thoughts.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
7. This is how you privatize
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 12:28 PM
Jan 2019

Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2019, 04:28 PM - Edit history (1)

....the commons. Why should the .01% define the direction our public services, policies, and needs take via such "donations."

Plus the rich get their family name to go up in lights etc.

Through his donations Gates is remaking public education. It's not okay.

Pay your effing share---raise all boats through universal health care, safe infrastructure, libraries, good public schools for all, research that allows us to enter the 21st century in fiber tech, universal basic income, funding for the arts. Etc.

skydive forever

(443 posts)
9. I like the look
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 01:41 PM
Jan 2019

I like the look on the white haired lady on the panel. It really struck me as a "Oh crap, who let him in here" moment.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Billionaire Faceplants LI...