Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

salmannaseem07

(393 posts) Sat Mar 30, 2019, 04:56 PM Mar 2019

benefits of these kid of games?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

benefits of these kid of games? (Original Post) salmannaseem07 Mar 2019 OP

? JHB Mar 2019 #1

You have no depth perception with one eye TexasBushwhacker Mar 2019 #2

They have fun? Or is that not allowed? I'm confused. nt DRoseDARs Mar 2019 #3

Yeah, that's what I was thinking (See #1) JHB Mar 2019 #4

I wish I was capable of having as much fun KayF Mar 2019 #5

JHB

(37,158 posts)

1. ?

Reply to salmannaseem07 (Original post)

Sat Mar 30, 2019, 05:28 PM

Mar 2019

TexasBushwhacker

(20,174 posts)

2. You have no depth perception with one eye

Reply to salmannaseem07 (Original post)

Sat Mar 30, 2019, 06:21 PM

Mar 2019

That's why all the kids miss. I've seen folks try to pour a glass of water from a pitcher with one eye covered. They end up pouring it on the floor.

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)

3. They have fun? Or is that not allowed? I'm confused. nt

Reply to salmannaseem07 (Original post)

Sat Mar 30, 2019, 06:49 PM

Mar 2019

JHB

(37,158 posts)

4. Yeah, that's what I was thinking (See #1)

Reply to DRoseDARs (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 30, 2019, 07:31 PM

Mar 2019

Is there a problem here? I mean, as long as they don't stumble and fall down on the bottle, but if that's an issue then substitutes can be found that preserve the basic fun of confounded expectations.

KayF

(1,345 posts)

5. I wish I was capable of having as much fun

Reply to salmannaseem07 (Original post)

Sat Mar 30, 2019, 08:14 PM

Mar 2019

as the adult laughing off camera.

Reply to this discussion