Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,020 posts) Fri Sep 7, 2012, 11:12 PM Sep 2012

Rachel Maddow - Anti-abortion Ohio legislator never thought about women

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - Anti-abortion Ohio legislator never thought about women (Original Post) Galraedia Sep 2012 OP

Jeeezus... jjewell Sep 2012 #1

I demand the right to make decisions on your behalf... icarusxat Sep 2012 #2

GOP? Thinking? Why would you expect the two to mesh in any way? HopeHoops Sep 2012 #3

Rachel references Mitt's Interview on MTP Heather MC Sep 2012 #4

We must get rid of clueless politicians. We deserve better. lumpy Sep 2012 #5

jjewell

(618 posts)

1. Jeeezus...

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:21 AM

Sep 2012

"I'm against a woman having an abortion, but I've never considered why a woman would seek to obtain one..."

This is an Ohio State Representative, who is legislating to outlaw abortion...

Jeeezus...

icarusxat

(403 posts)

2. I demand the right to make decisions on your behalf...

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sat Sep 8, 2012, 12:24 AM

Sep 2012

that I have never even thought about ??????

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

3. GOP? Thinking? Why would you expect the two to mesh in any way?

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sun Sep 9, 2012, 04:20 PM

Sep 2012

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)

4. Rachel references Mitt's Interview on MTP

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:35 AM

Sep 2012

I wonder if she will blast Dick Gregory for his Limpdick Interview with Mittens.
Because the few seconds I could stomach watching it, they appeared to be on a Date that was going extremely well.. I bet Mittens was able to sneek in a good night kiss

lumpy

(13,704 posts)

5. We must get rid of clueless politicians. We deserve better.

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:53 PM

Sep 2012

So many pols are concerned with their own egos, pensions and the next election. Mix that in with sheer ignorance and we get a fucked up nations.

Reply to this discussion