'This is bad news for Trump': Reporter reveals new Jan. 6 info (CNN)

[ItsjustMe]

CNN Special Correspondent Jamie Gangel and CNN political commentator Scott Jennings react to new information that there are "multiple sources" with firsthand knowledge of former President Donald Trump's activities during the Capitol insurrection on January 6.

[Botany]

1. This is significant because we are now seeing lifetime republicans lining up against TFG

A retired 3 star general (Gen. Kellogg)



and Scott Jennings a former staffer for Mitch McConnell and a special assistant to w bush.

[Alexander Of Assyria]

13. Lifelong Republicans, many are still honourable as they were before fascists shat all over

democracy…that very thing which the military is sworn to protect, if memory serves.

[magicguido]

2. the Degenerate was channel surfing while guzzling milkshakes as Brave Officers were Bear Sprayed

[JohnSJ]

3. Is it? I hope so, but I suspect much of the media may be playing the bothsiderism game, and/or

pushing the lies that will certainly come out of the trump machine refuting the witnesses and evidence as "fake"

Whether our democracy survives will depend on a lot of things, but how the media presents it will be a big part of it.

[Eliot Rosewater]

4. Yep, plus this is not bad news or news at all if our DOJ doesn't do something about it.

That the traitor sat there egging on the insurrection will HELP HIM when it comes to votes, NOT hurt him.

The only way these fascists are going down is if the law takes them down, and that is a big if.

The media will continue to play both sides AND WORSE if an indictment occurs I can GUARANTEE you that the MSM will be something like this:

"Today the Department of Justice under Merrick Garland indicted former president Donald Trump for his actions in the January 6 insurrection, but the main question is is this political or is this justice?"

That will be all they have to say and it is bye bye America.

For those who dont understand my posts, that is the question I am saying the MSM will ask, it is NOT me asking it.

[JohnSJ]

5. That too Eliot

[Diamond_Dog]

6. You are absolutely correct, Eliot.

[Eliot Rosewater]

7. Thanks, why aren't more people on the side of Democracy and justice, aka

progs, dems, libs, acting like the world is ending when IT IS?

So to speak, ending in that between climate change or global warming and the end of our democracy AND a fucking worldwide pandemic, if people arent going to act URGENT now, they NEVER will.

And this includes the media and all politicians who are not rightwingers.

If very high up maga/trumpers aren't indicted by the end of this month, it is panic time.

[llashram]

15. ++

true...very much...last line

[True Blue American]

10. Yep!

I bet Jennings was not too thrilled. He and Turkey make a good pair!

[BamaRefugee]

8. "This is bad news for Trump": the headline that has been printed 6,483 times since 2016.

[llashram]

14. thank you

and if trump runs in 2024 the MSM is going to fall all over themselves kissing his ass and praising him to high heaven Just like they did in 2016. And 1/6/21 will be the hot button that will turn cold with trump and his aides and their spin. And this only if the 1/6/21 commission is unable to bring this rat-a-lago denizen down!!!

[BamaRefugee]

16. "AN INCREDIBLE TALE OF GUTS, BELIEF IN GOD, AND GOOD TRIUMPHING OVER EVIL: THE DONALD TRUMP STORY"

Trust me.
It will be like this.

[llashram]

17. yep

[James48]

9. Don't let the Trumpers set the discussion!

They are going to say “So what? He watched it on TV. He didn’t TELL them to go spray bear spray on cops!”

In my book, Trump IS a criminal and needs to be charged with criminal seditious conspiracy. He DID talk with others about what was going to happen. We need witnesses to cooperate the criminal conspiracy.

[llashram]

11. that g. bush republikkkan

names all those "qualified" republikkkans that could run for the presidency is so full of shit I smell it through my screen... cruz, de santis, haley???

[Alexander Of Assyria]

12. Wait for it...but what is taking so long? Where is garland?? Nothing will come of this??

Tiresome pessimism not based on law, legal procedure or congressional investigative or the developing reality.

[Duppers]

18. Yes, WHERE IS GARLAND❓

Has our Democratic leadership just decided to give up on democracy??

[Alexander Of Assyria]

20. The AG role is not democratic leadership. The DOJ is independent of Party affiliation.

The 4 year episode of constitutional corruption where an AG was part of a Party leadership is over.

[twodogsbarking]

19. More blah, blah. Just arrest him. You can work the details out later.

See.

[Alexander Of Assyria]

21. Sir, prosecution requires investigation. Cart after horse is the usual way.

[twodogsbarking]

22. I was quoting TFG.

Google it.