Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

ItsjustMe

(11,230 posts) Wed Mar 8, 2023, 03:43 PM Mar 2023

WATCH: Tucker Carlson's Pathetic Stunt FLOPS - TYT Investigates

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WATCH: Tucker Carlson's Pathetic Stunt FLOPS - TYT Investigates (Original Post) ItsjustMe Mar 2023 OP

Flops? Cementing reich wing false narratives in place. "Flops"? We know is bogus but not audience.nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #1

But it does have screaming CAPS in the thread title, so there is that. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #2

I hope the mass media plays the violence again and again, people need to be reminded CharleyDog Mar 2023 #3

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)

1. Flops? Cementing reich wing false narratives in place. "Flops"? We know is bogus but not audience.nt

Reply to ItsjustMe (Original post)

Wed Mar 8, 2023, 03:45 PM

Mar 2023

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)

2. But it does have screaming CAPS in the thread title, so there is that. . . . nt

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 8, 2023, 03:46 PM

Mar 2023

CharleyDog

(757 posts)

3. I hope the mass media plays the violence again and again, people need to be reminded

Reply to ItsjustMe (Original post)

Wed Mar 8, 2023, 04:04 PM

Mar 2023

of the horror of that day. Caused BY Tucker's lies, and of course Trump. They have to absolve themselves,
even if they hate each other now.

Indictments would help. Indict Trump now while Fox Knews is sorta faltering/exposed before they
get their second wind and before Trump builds up his own head of Q-MAGA steam -- his retribution tour for the sheer fun of chaos and mayhem.

Reply to this discussion