The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forumshlthe2b
(102,197 posts)But, forever missed... RIP, Freddie
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Hard to quantify his impact, their impact on our music.
And I saw them live and let me tell you, having seen most any band you can name from our era
HOLY FUCK
...Queen live was an experience not to be missed. One of the loudest, most raucous shows I've ever seen and having worked in the industry, I've been to ~1000 concerts...
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)ADX
(1,622 posts)...both times at Madison Square Garden.
Croney
(4,657 posts)Ptah
(33,023 posts)Good one!
ADX
(1,622 posts)...but Queen is most definitely Top 5.
I'm looking forward to this flick but I hope they don't try to present an overly glossed-over version of events...
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)impact on the music world.
But if you mean also need to show their negatives, yeah that would be important.
Assume you know something about that as to them and others? Care to share?
ADX
(1,622 posts)...because once you start "Hollywoodizing" something, it can easily go to shit and that would be shameful for a group that was capable of going from "Fat-Bottomed Girls" to this at the drop of a hat:
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)1975
Then I played the record.
ADX
(1,622 posts)...'75 was "A Night At The Opera", followed by "A Day At The Races" in '76, "News Of The World"in '77, "Jazz" in '78, and "The Game" in '80.
Ah, the good ol' days, when bands put out real, quality product on a regular basis. And they played actual instruments - imagine that.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)by 1975 I meant that was approximately the year we would have gone to the concert and maybe a little earlier we would have seen the album cover and as str8t white males we were confused by the makeup.
And that would make sense in 1975
ADX
(1,622 posts)...Guys wearing make-up (like Bowie) was a definite oddity back in the day and that, coupled with the name "Queen", gave rise to all sorts of rumors about the band's sexual orientation, remember? Anyway, that nonsense dissipated pretty quickly and we were left with a musical legacy that will last for ages.
Here's one of their best works, a song that most people are totally unfamiliar with; personally, I consider it to be more of a sonic masterpiece than "Bohemian Rhapsody":
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)No pop hits longer than 3 and half minutes, etc.
Brother Buzz
(36,408 posts)The Shaggs are "Better than the Beatles" - Frank Zappa
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I saw ELO live about a month ago. They were phenomenal! One of the best concerts I've been to. I haven't been to a Queen concert. I really missed out. It's safe to say life was probably beating the crap out of me whenever they were in town. I have no other excuse.
red dog 1
(27,792 posts)Snellius
(6,881 posts)Queen's seems better in respect. At the time they bordered on kitschy glam.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)zanana1
(6,106 posts)If you overlook Mick Jagger's weird stage presence, the Stones were the biggest and badest!
ADX
(1,622 posts)...Led Zeppelin was better. The musicianship Zep brought to the table was pretty much unparalleled during that era...
ProfessorGAC
(64,970 posts)Also, given the song you have there, if you haven't heard the Pink: Live at the Funhouse tour version of her band doing it, check it out.
The music is a dead solid perfect tribute and the vocals are amazing.