Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bobbieinok

(12,858 posts)
Wed May 27, 2020, 04:18 PM May 2020

What happened to concept of noblesse oblige? Idea that those with privilege have obligation to help

......help those with less privilege.

And are most especially obliged to help those with none.

Might slide into 'lady bountiful' syndrome, but at least that's way better than a world of Trump and gang

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happened to concept of noblesse oblige? Idea that those with privilege have obligation to help (Original Post) bobbieinok May 2020 OP
reagan made it greed popular. it's your money, government is the problem, etc. unblock May 2020 #1
The IA League of Women Voters I knew in 80s all told of learning nob ob in childhood from adults the bobbieinok May 2020 #2
"From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; Totally Tunsie May 2020 #3
Your OP made me think of a Netflix movie I saw recently called "The Platform" EarlG May 2020 #4
Sounds fascinating, but I am not sure I could handle the smirkymonkey May 2020 #6
Yes, unfortunately it's pretty gross EarlG May 2020 #7
I did see Parasite, which I was pretty impressed with. smirkymonkey May 2020 #8
The BLESSE got tossed! whistler162 May 2020 #5
Neoliberalism killed it I_UndergroundPanther May 2020 #9
I was taught it growing up (I.m 74), soldierant May 2020 #10

unblock

(52,089 posts)
1. reagan made it greed popular. it's your money, government is the problem, etc.
Wed May 27, 2020, 04:34 PM
May 2020

people now hold up gates and buffett as some sort of rare saints for giving so much away (and yet still not enough to drop them from the list of insanely wealthy people), as opposed to merely doing giving back what what they owe to a society that enabled their insane wealth in the first place.

bobbieinok

(12,858 posts)
2. The IA League of Women Voters I knew in 80s all told of learning nob ob in childhood from adults the
Wed May 27, 2020, 04:55 PM
May 2020

Learned concept from parents, family, entire world in which they grew up

Totally Tunsie

(10,885 posts)
3. "From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required;
Wed May 27, 2020, 05:14 PM
May 2020

and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded"

Luke 12:48

EarlG

(21,929 posts)
4. Your OP made me think of a Netflix movie I saw recently called "The Platform"
Wed May 27, 2020, 05:26 PM
May 2020

I highly recommend it, with the MAJOR caveat that it contains extreme gore and violence. If you are not comfortable watching that sort of thing, DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE. IT WILL UPSET YOU GREATLY.

I haven't really included any spoilers below, but if you want to go into this movie with no knowledge of what it's about, stop reading now.

----------------

With that warning in place, the setup of the movie is as follows: it's set in what is essentially a vertical prison, starting with level 1 at the top and extending downwards to an unknown number of floors below. Each level is an identical, concrete room about 20 feet by 20 feet, and about 10 feet tall, with a large rectangular hole in the center of the floor and ceiling. The entire movie is set in this location, making it quite surreal and dreamlike (or rather, nightmarish) -- you don't really learn anything about the world outside.

There are two people -- prisoners? Let's call them "residents" -- who live on each level. At the end of each month, the residents are gassed unconscious, and randomly assigned to a new level, where they wake up.

The catch is that while the residents are provided with water, their only food comes from a platform which floats down through the large rectangular hole once per day. The food on the platform begins as a sumptuous, perfect banquet provided by elite chefs on level 0. As the platform descends, it stops at each level for a few minutes, and the two residents can eat as much as they like. (However, if they take any food off the platform and attempt to store it, their level quickly becomes either too hot or too cold to endure, and they will die.)

The point is that if each resident consumed a small ration of food every day, the platform would contain enough food for everyone to survive. But you can guess what actually happens -- the people at the top eat like kings, but the lower the platform goes, the less food is available, until pretty quickly there aren't even scraps left. What happens to the people on the lower levels, I shall leave to your imagination (another warning: the movie does not leave it to your imagination).

But what's fascinating is how the people react when they're on different levels. Even though they know that they may wake up on a level where they won't get any food for 30 days -- and even AFTER they've gone through that horrible experience -- they still stuff their faces when they wake up on a higher level, because they think they "deserve" it. Not only that, but they cruelly deride the people below them -- even though they may have just been in that position, and even though they arrived on their current level through pure chance.

Ultimately the movie is about one guy who tries to see if he can break the system.

It's a truly weird, messed-up movie, but a fascinating commentary on human behavior, capitalism, and game theory. It's a metaphor for how even though we want the people "above" to share with us, we often fail to appreciate that there are many more people "below" us, with whom we don't want to share. And that most people will automatically consider their own personal well-being above the good of society, even knowing that if we all considered what's in society's best interests, we'd be able to protect ourselves from terrible outcomes. (So maybe the movie is about climate change and health care as well.)

But yeah, one final warning: there are some extreme scenes in this movie that most people will find more than a little upsetting.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
6. Sounds fascinating, but I am not sure I could handle the
Wed May 27, 2020, 05:49 PM
May 2020

gore and violence. I like the concept. I wish there was a film in the same vein that wasn't quite so graphic.

EarlG

(21,929 posts)
7. Yes, unfortunately it's pretty gross
Wed May 27, 2020, 06:18 PM
May 2020

If you’re looking for something similar I’d consider it along the same lines as Snowpiercer (which is actually also quite violent, but in a bit more of a Hollywood actiony kinda way) or Parasite, by the same director, (which also has some violence but IIRC that’s mostly restricted to one scene). All interesting takes on class structure/privilege.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
8. I did see Parasite, which I was pretty impressed with.
Wed May 27, 2020, 06:29 PM
May 2020

I will have to check out Snowpiercer. I looked up "Platform" on IMDB and it does sound really interesting, but kind of overly violent and grotesque. Maybe someday I will be able to stomach it. Thanks for the recommendations!

soldierant

(6,776 posts)
10. I was taught it growing up (I.m 74),
Wed May 27, 2020, 11:39 PM
May 2020

but it was gone long before Reagan, and even longer before neoliberalism.

And I don't just mean the phrase (today's Americans know French much?), I mean the concept.

I always figured it was just swallowed up by selfishness. There's always plenty of that around.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»What happened to concept ...