Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1282 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calm down Pythagoras, calm down (Original Post)
Snake Plissken
Nov 2020
OP
There is clearly a missing 8.48528 missing from this diagram somewhere ;) nt
mr_lebowski
Nov 2020
#4
Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)1. Given a properly warped surface, that can still be true nt
Celerity
(43,304 posts)6. +100, and the whole thing is cleverclogs, as the top pic is fake
Photoshopped to set up the second pic. It is an forced, inorganic attempt at humour.
apcalc
(4,463 posts)2. In a square , length of side times root 2 equals length of diagonal.
Last edited Mon Nov 16, 2020, 12:38 AM - Edit history (4)
But hey , its not THAT much bigger than the side!
unblock
(52,196 posts)3. It's actually trick! One "feef" equals zero "feet"
The bottom two people are actually right next to each other, each forming the bottom point of an equilateral triangle with the top two people.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)4. There is clearly a missing 8.48528 missing from this diagram somewhere ;) nt
underpants
(182,767 posts)5. As depicted no but you could have two equilateral triangles
Mind