Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 05:56 PM Jan 2012

Really? Melissa McCarthey for Best Supporting Actress

Sorry that was a lame movie that was a rip-off of the Hangover. Zach Galifianakis did that role way better and was way more deserving of an Oscar. That part McCarthy was nothing more than every single fat woman stereo type roled into one character.

There were much better actresses out there to be considered for Best Supporting Actress like that girl who played George Clooney's daughter in "The Descendants"

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Really? Melissa McCarthey for Best Supporting Actress (Original Post) LynneSin Jan 2012 OP
I half agree Divameow77 Jan 2012 #1
Hollywood loves a stereotype. ohiosmith Jan 2012 #2
The reviews I read NewJeffCT Jan 2012 #3
Better than the rest of the dreary crap that got nominated for an Oscar this year WildEyedLiberal Jan 2012 #4

Divameow77

(1,630 posts)
1. I half agree
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:11 PM
Jan 2012

I liked the movie and I thought she was funny but I can't believe she was nominated. I think her nomination is the result of her being the current "Hollywood Plus-sized Sweetheart".

In 5 years she will probably be in the same place as Camryn Manheim.

"This is for the fat girls!"

WildEyedLiberal

(12,799 posts)
4. Better than the rest of the dreary crap that got nominated for an Oscar this year
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jan 2012

This is one telecast I won't be watching

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Really? Melissa McCarthe...