Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
1. I did it with FamilyTreeDNA.com
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 03:35 PM
Jun 2013

through the genealogy website GENI.com. The tests cost a bit less for GENI members.
I paid $129 for a mitochondrial DNA plus test and am not sure it was worth it.

Collecting the sample was easy

I was surprised that the two closest genetic matches I have in their database were women from Ireland and West Virginia. To the best of my knowledge my maternal ancestors were
all Estonian peasants. The results showed that I was a T haplotype through the maternal line, whereas most Estonians are U haplotypes. I'm actually wondering whether they mixed me up with someone else.

a kennedy

(29,619 posts)
4. Hey, thanks for this info....
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:20 PM
Jun 2013

It'll be quite awhile before I scrape up enough money anyway....so this info is great.

Response to a kennedy (Original post)

a kennedy

(29,619 posts)
5. Thank you, I won't do Ancestry.com you and some others have indicated there are better organizations
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jun 2013

out there for me to go with. Thanks. I'll be a while before I get the cash to anything anyway, but this is good info. Thanks again.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
3. I like the National Geographic one
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:39 PM
Jun 2013

The Geno 2.0 - Genographic Project Participation and DNA Ancestry Kit.

It's $200 but it's nicely detailed and provides you with a lot of information.

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/about/

a kennedy

(29,619 posts)
6. National Geographic sounds intriguing.....
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:24 PM
Jun 2013

more expensive, but as long as I've got to save for it, might as well save more for a better result. Thanks for the info.

pink-o

(4,056 posts)
8. I was gonna suggest that one too.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:54 PM
Jun 2013

Mainly, because I'm fascinated with Spencer Wells' research and the fee you pay goes directly towards that.

They show this periodically on PBS, and I watch every time it airs. Really cool stuff:


csziggy

(34,131 posts)
10. Any of the ones you're interested in, sign up for a newsletter/emails
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 11:15 PM
Jun 2013

Just about every one has specials every so often and you can get a great discount.

I haven't done any of them - I know too much about my genealogy for a general DNA test to tell me much. I'm tempted to ask a cousin to get his DNA tested to trace the direct male line. We have a brick wall on that side four or five generations back and Y-DNA might give us clues as to where the first ancestor we know of came from. There is no point for me as a woman to get tested to trace that line, it wouldn't be specific enough to help.

Here is the Ancestry new forum for their DNA tests - you don't have to be an Ancestry member or sign up to read the messages. http://ancestryforums.custhelp.com/hives/543291e013/summary

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»I'm this close to doing t...