Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 01:28 PM Jun 2013

Superman Man of Steel disguise

This must be one of the worst probable explanation I have seen from an article trying to be smart.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2013/06/superman_man_of_steel_disguise_prosopagnosia_explains_why_no_one_recognizes.html

Why Can’t Anyone Recognize Superman?
The neurological explanation for why the Daily Planet staff falls for the lousy Clark Kent disguise.
By Kyle Hill|Posted Friday, June 14, 2013, at 8:38 AM


Seriously, to try to explain it away by inability of perception by others through some sort of neurological disorder is ridiculous. A reporter needs the ability of facial recognition.

I posit a different explanation.
http://www.radiolab.org/2011/apr/18/mirror-mirror/
The way a person does their hair can change perception. It is why some people say you should part your hair from the left.

Well, in some comics they did explain that Superman can adjust his height and musculature, where he has enough control over his body that he can make himself look shorter, and less ripped. Which makes more sense any way.
Pump your muscles a bit and it gets bigger, and slouch... This does make a huge difference.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Superman Man of Steel disguise (Original Post) Xyzse Jun 2013 OP
The glasses bit worked for actor Harold LLoyd. Staph Jun 2013 #1
Yep, small things make a lot of difference Xyzse Jun 2013 #2
I like the explanation given in Superman: Birthright MicaelS Jun 2013 #3
I can definitely agree with this Xyzse Jun 2013 #4
Hollywood has a problem with things like this.... Wounded Bear Jun 2013 #5
Its because of the codpiece.... Broken_Hero Jun 2013 #6
Very good explanation Xyzse Jun 2013 #7

Staph

(6,251 posts)
1. The glasses bit worked for actor Harold LLoyd.
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 01:54 PM
Jun 2013

Joe Shuster, creator of Superman, said, "Clark Kent, I suppose, had a little bit of Harold Lloyd in him."

Lloyd's "glasses" character was world famous in the days of silent films, and yet Lloyd could remove those lens-less glasses and be completely anonymous.





MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
3. I like the explanation given in Superman: Birthright
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 01:59 PM
Jun 2013

In that, Martha Kent gives him a pair of Jonathan Kent's thick glasses, which change the look of his eyes, tell him to wear baggy clothes, muss his hair, slouch, and get some books on acting and study them.

I often have thought the simplest explanation is that how many people would think this guy who has godlike powers would want to put on a disguise, and walk around us? "That guy sort of looks like Superman, but he's always off flying around, can't be him."

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. I can definitely agree with this
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jun 2013

Since it is very true to begin with. Demeanor, the way one carries oneself effects a lot.

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
5. Hollywood has a problem with things like this....
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jun 2013

They need to have their characters go into disguise per the plot line, but they still need the audience to recognize who they are.

Broken_Hero

(59,305 posts)
6. Its because of the codpiece....
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 02:23 AM
Jun 2013

as Superman...the Super-Codpiece is so apparent no one can take their eyes away from it, and no one really gets a look at Superman's face.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Superman Man of Steel dis...