Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
4. I love a good armaedden movie
Mon Aug 5, 2013, 12:35 PM
Aug 2013

Sharknado was almost as bad as Armageddon and it cost about 1/1000th. as much to make .

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
6. Armageddon, definitely.
Mon Aug 5, 2013, 11:39 PM
Aug 2013

I mean, what can beat Bruce Willis chasing Ben Affleck around an oil rig with a shotgun?

petronius

(26,598 posts)
8. I've not seen either, but I was going to vote for Armageddon simply because
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 01:04 AM
Aug 2013

Deep Impact is such a dopey-sounding, self-consciously-clever, Steven-Seagal-like title. And even though Seagal had nothing to do with Deep Impact as far as I know, it sounds like a title he would choose, and that's enough. However, it turns out that Seagal actually was in a movie slash beer commercial called Sheep Impact, which creates a quandary: can I truly reject Deep Impact for sounding Seagalish in title when Seagal himself participated in sort of spoofing it?

But, it turned out that Sheep Impact wasn't quite as funny as I hoped, not enough to redeem the name-lameness of Deep Impact. Therefore, I vote for Armageddon (and I trust my unassailable reasoning will now put this thread to bed)...

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Deep Impact vs Armageddon