The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsNetflix's House of Cards is out today... *SPOILERS* thread to talk about it?
Yeah, I know kind of sad but this is how the wife and I are spending Valentine's day.
Anyone want to talk about it... Check in.
OMG ZOE
We have seen the British version and figure it would stay true but wow
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I'm going to have to wait another 364 days to find out what happens next??!!!
This season was so much better than last and the ending was amazing. It reminded me a bit like watching the first season of Survivor - back when no one had any clue what to do with the game. And you could see Richard playing all the contestants perfectly against each other until the end he came out the winner.
What's worse is I truly think Garrett was always innocent.
And you think Zoe was a shocker wait til you get to the end of Chapter 24
WOWZA
Flaxbee
(13,661 posts)I'm already stunned, 4 episodes in.
This show is just riveting. Love it.
Flaxbee
(13,661 posts)The first episode of this season was more ruthless than almost the entirety of the last season combined... you could see the hesitation over Peter, but not a single second thought about Zoe.
I was stunned.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)She makes Macbeth's mother look like Mother Theresa.
sarge43
(28,940 posts)Buttercup is now a long time ago in a ...., well, you know.
(Macbeth's wife. His mother was probably equally bloody minded)
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Been ages since I've read my Shakespeare.
But you get the jist of it. Claire is ruthless and I love her. If anything the Underwoods are a modern day MacBeth and I look forward to both of them getting their comeuppance - but not at least for another 4-5 seasons.
It's weird - I am torn whether or not in the end of HoC when they stop making new seasons should the Underwoods finally pay for all of their crimes or allow them to get away with it.
sarge43
(28,940 posts)It's following the British version fairly closely
At least Claire had the humanity to have some remorse
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Frank is predictable. You never trust him. He's always out for Frank. Fool me once... and all that. Claire, on the other hand, is not predictable. Do not tangle with Claire on any level!
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)that Claire really wanted to have a baby.
Turns out she was just trying to trap Gillian into a corner where she either had to take the money or allow her baby to die.
That was just fucked up Claire.
Even the subtle things that she does - like getting the First Lady jealous of Christina. Next thing you know the First family is in therapy and it comes out the Prez was taking valium. You know that in a way Claire had that all planned. She's killer like that.
nytemare
(10,888 posts)I think I jumped off the sofa a little bit with the Zoe thing. The previews made it seem like she would be a big part of the season.
And episode 11 of the new season!
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)But that's because her death helped build new plotlines
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,531 posts)I mean, first she wants to have a baby, then she doesn't.
And why is she threatening her former pregnant employee?
I just have no clue.
Any of you all know what's the deal?
sarge43
(28,940 posts)1. The employee, Gillian Cole, didn't like the political deals Claire cut to secure funding for her pet project Clean Water Initiative. Went to the mat and Claire booted her.
2. Gillian sues Claire, claiming discrimination re the pregnancy
3. Claire goes through the medical drill about a middle age first pregnancy to secure information. She did this (1) leave no traceable trail and (2) the info is correct. There are vague hints Claire regretted not having children, but that was probably a McGuffin
4. She has Gillian's med records and knows she has to have an expensive med. Claire (read the small print) pulls Gillian's health insurance.
5. Claire then tells Gillian drop the suit and you have your meds and the Clean Water Initiative. Keep going and suffer a still birth.
Neither Frank nor Claire are sadists; they are stone cold ruthless. Borrowing the Body Heat meme, they do what is necessary.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,531 posts)That is very helpful. And it all makes sense.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)When Claire visited Gillian at her home and Gillian admits to lying, and that she "learned it from her" (Claire) -- I for sure thought Claire would have recorded that conversation. Why didn't she? It would have been a slam dunk then. Sloppy for an Underwood.
sarge43
(28,940 posts)Gillian still might have taken the suit to court. Claire may well have recorded the conversation as backup. However, threatening Gillian's baby was guaranteed to make her back down. Plus, Gillian learned a very important lesson -- don't take on the Underwoods. Further, good story telling -- underlines what Frank and Claire are capable of. Any player can record a conversation. Only a sensei threatens at that level.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)She wanted to make the lawsuit go away and knew that normal means would not work. Gillian was not willing to settle even though her lawyers strongly recommended it. By threatening Gillian's unborn child she had the tools to end the lawsuit. But Claire wasn't totally dirty - she did give Gilluan control of CWI. Claire knew she had to step down.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)They dumped ALL the season 2 episodes on the same day? Or did I miss it the first time they ran?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,531 posts)They did the same thing with Season one.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)I think it will change TV.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Much more than the American version. Three seasons and they are all on Netflix too.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Claire and Frank's sexuality.
1. They are affectionate and appear deeply in love.
2. But, I don't recall them ever participating in the sexual act with each other.
3. Frank screwed Zoe. No question there.
4. Claire screwed Alanbut did we actually see the act? I don't remember. Somebody correct me if I missed something.
5. Claire and Frank and Secret Service agent get it on, but we don't see who screwed whom.
I'm thinking Frank is sexually active, but Claire isn't. (Possibly because of the rape and abortions.) But she accepts Frank's needs and takes pleasure when he is satisfied, whether it be porn or an affair. Frank is indulgent of her need for love (Alan), whether or not it is consummated, and in fact hopes that it is.
Anybody have thoughts on this?
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Remember the eppy in S1 where they met at a reunion or somesuch & sat around afterward, alone, "reminscing" about how they felt for each other?
I think Frank is a carnivo-sexual ... he does who/what he needs/wants as a means to an end.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)He certainly has a means justifies the end approach, but that doesn't explain the secret service guy. Yet.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)And I honestly have no fucking clue what's going on this season. Am I getting too old to follow along?
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)It comes together.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)I thought the could have been a male lover in Frank's past when the showed that conversation between the two. But I dismissed it by the end of the episode since nothing more came of it. Now at the minimum Frank is a bisexual but I sometimes question if he is gay and uses Claire as his beard.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Frank as a homosexual.
nytemare
(10,888 posts)I believe there were a few instances in season 1 where it was implied that Claire and Frank were about to "get busy", so to speak. I believe the same was implied with Claire and Alan, not sure if they actually showed it like Frank and Zoe, but was implied.
I am remembering the episode in season 2 where Edward, the SS Agent, walked in on Frank watching the porn video, and Frank later discussed it with Claire so openly, perhaps forecasting the later encounter in Episode 11. It seemed to me they were all very interested in each other. The tension was palpable.
I think Frank is bisexual, and his relationship with Claire is very sexual. I think Frank had the relationship with Zoe as a means to an ends, and that Claire knew about everything that went on, although you could see some jealousy on her part there. She went back to Alan so she could feel in control of herself again. I also think that Frank was jealous of that relationship, but realized that it was somewhat of a payback to him over how he was acting.
The episode in season 1 with Frank's reunion was pretty interesting, and the portrayal of his relationship with his old friend added a lot of depth to his character.
I enjoy how the characters of Frank and Claire fluctuate between being completely ruthless to almost likeable, where you almost root for them. Halfway through the new season, I wanted to reach through the screen to punch Tusk..lol.
I'm going to have to do another binge view of season 2 now.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)God, I think this series may be a documentary.
nytemare
(10,888 posts)I think Frank Underwood is my favorite TV villain ever.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Everything about the sexual congress between Claire and Frank is implied. Which begs the question, do they really "do it"?
nytemare
(10,888 posts)The statements that Frank makes to the camera, saying that he loves her more than sharks love blood and so forth, and the manner in which he said those things, led me to believe that they have a very physical relationship.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)They have shown other "explicit" relationships, but never Claire and Frank. Why not?
And love and sex are not necessarily inclusive.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)It wasn't a threesome. I think Claire was giving Meecham and her husband the ok to go ahead and have sex.
I think the big secret is that Frank is gay. We see alot of sex in HoC but we never see sex between Frank and Claire.
Now I know that some will say 'But Frank had sex with Zoe' - yes he did. But look at her body shape - she was slim and didn't have alot of curves going on with her body. Zoe was never about Frank having sex but Frank having control over this reporter that could benefit him.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)It was never about sex, whether or not Frank is gay or heterosexual.
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)who do you think ultimately assassinates President Underwood? Rachel? Lucas? Or hell, Claire?
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Rachel is still in play. And gawd only knows what Claire will do. But, I'm not sure assassination will be the end result. Disgrace, defeat, perhaps suicide, but not assassination.
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)Assassination would be a fitting way to end the series. But I could see it ending a couple other ways. Certainly suicide is possible, as is him being arrested. Actually, I could also see it suddenly flash forwarding 10-15 years to show him still as the President/Dictator and fighting a brutal, bloody war against an insurgency, having successfully brought down the house of cards that is our country.