Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's something that you don't see very often. (Original Post) qnr Jul 2016 OP
She is beautiful Marie Marie Jul 2016 #1
She is indeed. n/t qnr Jul 2016 #2
I don't think I've ever seen anybody smile in a photo of that era. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2016 #3
It is cute. There were a lot of reasons (I have seen one or two before this) qnr Jul 2016 #4
It's rare, but not unheard of. malthaussen Jul 2016 #5
Want to be seen as upper class and as a person of good character? Don’t smile. progressoid Jul 2016 #8
Fascinating article - thanks! The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2016 #11
Wow, that looks like it was taken yesterday. rug Jul 2016 #6
I know just what you mean! n/t qnr Jul 2016 #7
So beautiful. Aristus Jul 2016 #9
I'll check it out when I get home. :D n/t qnr Jul 2016 #10

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,656 posts)
3. I don't think I've ever seen anybody smile in a photo of that era.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jul 2016

I don't know whether that was because getting your picture taken was kind of a big deal then and people were expected to be appropriately solemn and dignified, or because you had to hold still for the exposure and your smile would collapse too easily. All the old photos from my grandparents' era and before then look like they were about to be hanged. This photo is really cute.

qnr

(16,190 posts)
4. It is cute. There were a lot of reasons (I have seen one or two before this)
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jul 2016

Holding a fake smile for many minutes would be very painful, and look, well, fake. In this case, it looks like there was a great light source, so she may not have had to hold it as long.

They were, indeed, solemn occasions.

Lots of them were once in a lifetime occurrences; many times arranged to get a deceased family member memorialized in the photo. Probably didn't want to try to smile too much with the corpse of your relative near you.

malthaussen

(17,183 posts)
5. It's rare, but not unheard of.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:25 AM
Jul 2016

My opinion is that one was expected to maintain dignity at all times, so smiling would be right out. And no doubt time of exposure would have encouraged that, but that would vary a lot.

-- Mal

progressoid

(49,961 posts)
8. Want to be seen as upper class and as a person of good character? Don’t smile.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jul 2016
By the 17th century in Europe it was a well-established fact that the only people who smiled broadly, in life and in art, were the poor, the lewd, the drunk, the innocent, and the entertainment.

http://publicdomainreview.org/2013/09/18/the-serious-and-the-smirk-the-smile-in-portraiture/

Aristus

(66,307 posts)
9. So beautiful.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 07:28 PM
Jul 2016

Want to see how beautiful people can be when they smile? Check this out:

(There's one person who obviously distrusted the videographer; ignore her...)

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Here's something that you...