The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsWhy do we always end up with a new president in an election year that ends with 8?
I know it's just a coincidence, but it's still bizarre as hell.
1788: Washington
1808: Madison
1828: Jackson
1848: Taylor
1868: Grant
1888: B. Harrison
1908: Taft
1928: Hoover
1968: Nixon
1988: G. H. W. Bush
2008: Obama
The only exception to this pattern was 1948 when Truman, the incumbent president, won reelection. That's it.
Thoughts?
GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,629 posts)kellytore
(182 posts)The Republicans have not won the White House without a Bush or Nixon on the ticket since 1928.
eppur_se_muova
(36,257 posts)1960 1964 1968 1972 1976
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016
If roughly two-thirds of our Presidents are re-elected and serve eight years, and the others only four years, it is highly likely that an approximately 20-year long pattern will emerge. It happens to be years ending in 8; it could just as well have been years ending in 0, 4, 2, or 6 -- and in some of those years, we did get new presidents, as we must at least as often as every eight years:
1960 Kennedy
1964 Johnson
1976 Carter
1980 Reagan
1992 Clinton
2000 Bu**sh**
So your rule doesn't work both ways anyway. Try asking why we don't get a new President in years ending in a 5 and suddenly it seems a lot less mysterious...
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...he actually was elected easily, just as all the polls said he would be. But his administration was such a catastrophe that there's been an open conspiracy never to so much as talk about it. Thus, the myth of Truman's "upset victory" was concocted. Everyone--journalists, historians, you name it--is in on the conspiracy. As, of course, are the American people. It's an open secret among everyone in the country over 80, but one that nobody ever talks about...