Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,970 posts)
Mon Jun 12, 2017, 10:52 PM Jun 2017

State pays $393K for 'slut-shaming' defense of former Arizona Wildcats track coach

“Please provide the name and contact information of each and every person to whom you have sent photographs and or videos of your exposed breasts, vulva and/or anus since January 1, 2010.”

The taxpayers of Arizona paid former University of Arizona track coach Craig Carter’s legal team to ask for that information. Representing Carter, Tucson attorney John Munger and his associates also asked Baillie Gibson, a former UA track athlete who is suing Carter, for this:

“The name and contact information of each and every person with whom you have engaged in sexual intercourse or had a sexual encounter since January 1, 2010.”

So far, the state of Arizona has paid the Munger Chadwick firm about $393,000 to provide a defense for Carter in the lawsuit filed against him and the university by Gibson. We are required to, I’m informed, because under Arizona law the state government must cover the defense of an employee being sued for behavior he engaged in while acting within the scope of his job.

Read more: http://tucson.com/news/local/columnists/steller/steller-state-pays-k-for-slut-shaming-defense-of-former/article_fecf404c-dbb6-5429-b8aa-edc6f6ffe262.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State pays $393K for 'slut-shaming' defense of former Arizona Wildcats track coach (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jun 2017 OP
I hate to make this a union thing...but when this kinda of clause makes it into union contracts... MadDAsHell Jun 2017 #1
 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
1. I hate to make this a union thing...but when this kinda of clause makes it into union contracts...
Mon Jun 12, 2017, 11:18 PM
Jun 2017

it just gives the neocons more fodder against us. Why, oh why do unions do this to themselves...

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arizona»State pays $393K for 'slu...