Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,935 posts)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 04:38 AM Jun 2019

Splintered Arkansas Supreme Court puts a crack in public meeting law

A fractured Arkansas Supreme Court today opened the door for private discussion of public business by e-mail, though it could have been worse had a couple of justices had their way.

The case was an appeal by Fort Smith of a lower court ruling that the Freedom of Information Act provision relating to open meetings had been violated when three city directors and the city administrator discussed by e-mail changing civil service rules on police promotions.

No final decision was reached in the exchange of e-mails. But the e-mails discussed various options, city directors expressed preferences and, ultimately, in a public meeting, adopted something one of the directors had advocated.

In an opinion written by Justice Courtney Goodson, the Supreme Court rejected the city’s argument that an exchange of e-mails could not be deemed a meeting. The court long ago held that private telephone conversations were meetings and it said today there was “no material difference” between telephone discussions and e-mail discussions.

Read more: https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2019/06/20/splintered-arkansas-supreme-court-puts-a-crack-in-public-meeting-law

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arkansas»Splintered Arkansas Supre...