California

sl8

(13,749 posts) Sun Nov 22, 2020, 08:35 AM Nov 2020

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (sl8) on Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:18 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) sl8 Nov 2020 OP

That boggles my mind Sherman A1 Nov 2020 #1

It may be because a conviction would reopen cases where she was the "expert" witness. 3Hotdogs Nov 2020 #2

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)

1. That boggles my mind

Reply to sl8 (Original post)

Sun Nov 22, 2020, 08:39 AM

Nov 2020

I think she should be prosecuted and see where the facts lead. I don’t think jail is appropriate, but a hefty fine and long term community service.

3Hotdogs

(12,374 posts)

2. It may be because a conviction would reopen cases where she was the "expert" witness.

Reply to Sherman A1 (Reply #1)

Sun Nov 22, 2020, 09:47 AM

Nov 2020

---leads one to wonder if hers is also one of law enforcements' expert witnesses that turn out to be based on bullshit. Kinda like the arson expert or the dental tooth mark expert whose testimonies were pulled out of their asses/