Florida
Related: About this forumHow to vote on Florida Amendments
I recently attended a monthly meeting of a local Women's Democratic Club. They had a speaker from the League of Women's Voters. He went over each Constitutional Amendment that will be on Florida's ballot in November. He also distributed a handy reference guide to help us in the voting booth.
As you are probably aware, many amendments are written in such a way to make them sound as if they positively impact progressive issues but in fact would have just the opposite impact
So to help you out, here is a copy of the handy reference card.
Here is an explanation of what a Yes or No vote would mean.
https://ballotpedia.org/Sample_Ballot_Lookup#address=32080&election=2018-11-06
lpbk2713
(42,754 posts)You cleared the air for me.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)but agree with the rest.
The Tampa Bay Times says most of these things don't belong in the Constitution and we should only vote YES on #4. League of Women Voters pretty much agree with the voting above.
patricia92243
(12,595 posts)Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I'm expecting my absentee ballot in a week or so since I'm leaving town for a few weeks. This will be a big help to expedite the voting process
lamp_shade
(14,828 posts)hay rick
(7,607 posts)Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)The casino gambling amendment. Not much air time regarding others, unless I simply haven't seen them
I'm biased in favor of Florida approving sports betting. Given the makeup of the legislature I'm not expecting it
rzemanfl
(29,556 posts)Lunabell
(6,078 posts)I'll print this up for my wife to pursue too.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Simply not there. I don't understand why. I am in Miami. It skipped directly from 7 to 9. I was extremely careful checking and checking again. That amendment was nowhere on my absentee ballot.
Regarding the justices, I realize it's a waste of time since they will virtually always be retained but I looked them all up individually and they were appointed by Rick Scott so I voted No.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I missed that information when it happened
https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/08/20/judge-orders-amendment-8-be-removed-from-florida-ballot/
Fla Dem
(23,654 posts)Sorry I didn't mention that in my original post.
RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)Glad that this sample ballot shows the same thing. There is something really off about this "Victim's Rights" law. Why are they bundling it with other items?
Also included:
The proposed amendment would also raise the mandatory retirement age for judges from 70 to 75. Lastly, it would require judges to decide if a state agency correctly interpreted the law.
https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/election-2018-activists-say-rights-of-crime-victims-amendment-would-favor-corporations-limit-rights-of-the-accused-9934241?fbclid=IwAR0lN8GvhNSTBbjrjZqA2QInEiEc9hJMhHxdBzQM6-rnzjBzrcboBHIrB-E
Victim's Rights are already available to us. So why is this needed again??
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)I agree with everything else on here, I'm not sure about this one?
Fla Dem
(23,654 posts)Lof Women Voter in Florida take no position; Yes or No.
https://www.lwvfl.org/amendments/amendment12/
Democratic party of Florida is a solid no.
https://www.progressivefl.org/dpcf-2018-amendments/
Actually this is a toss-up. While the amendment imposes restrictions on lobbying, which is a good thing, it doesn't address the real issue of the amount of money lobbyist pay to public office officials.
Guess you have to decide if half an apple is better than none.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)If the only argument is that is doesn't go far enough, I guess something it better than nothing.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)kydo
(2,679 posts)In group 5 no dem. Karen Heriot is rethug and Shaun Kunz is Libertarian.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Straight D and to repeal Scott's judges.