Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,944 posts)
Thu Dec 3, 2020, 08:27 AM Dec 2020

Supreme Court to consider Indiana's request to not list both gay parents on birth certificates

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Indiana’s attorney general submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that it should reverse a federal appeals court’s ruling that allowed both members of same-sex couples in Indiana to be listed as parents on the birth certificates of their children.

The petition from Attorney General Curtis Hill follows a January decision by the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that affirmed a decision by judges in Indiana’s federal southern district court who found that Indiana laws limiting who can be called the parent of a child were unconstitutional.

Hill filed also filed a request in June asking the court to review the appellate court’s decision.

The original case involved Ashlee and Ruby Henderson, a gay married couple from Lafayette who filed a federal lawsuit in 2015 challenging Indiana’s birth records law. They sued the state health commissioner and Tippecanoe County officials because county officials would not list both of them as parents on the birth certificate of their son, who Ruby conceived through artificial insemination.

Read more: https://www.southbendtribune.com/news/indiana/supreme-court-to-consider-indianas-request-to-not-list-both-gay-parents-on-birth-certificates/article_57968ec5-ce49-51fc-a4d5-8dc2aca92717.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court to consider Indiana's request to not list both gay parents on birth certificates (Original Post) TexasTowelie Dec 2020 OP
Just seems so strange that the state would get involved in this jimfields33 Dec 2020 #1
Very sad HockeyMom Dec 2020 #2
Indiana just wants to be hard-assed about this for no real reason. marble falls Dec 2020 #3
Most likely it is part of Mike Pence's legacy. nt TexasTowelie Dec 2020 #4

jimfields33

(15,693 posts)
1. Just seems so strange that the state would get involved in this
Thu Dec 3, 2020, 08:40 AM
Dec 2020

If it is state law, change it. States focus on such strange things. It hurts nobody to have two names on a birth certificate.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
2. Very sad
Thu Dec 3, 2020, 09:04 AM
Dec 2020

Needs to change. My Grandson's BC from NY two years ago lists both my Daughter and DIL's names on his. Actually, NY lists the names as Parent #1 and Parent #2. When I had to request another official one for my Social Security, my BC says the same.

Great idea! This is what all states should do now.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Indiana»Supreme Court to consider...