Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,120 posts)
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 02:05 PM Jan 2021

Kansas abortion amendment inspires call for boycott of Republican-affiliated businesses

TOPEKA — A Kansas community organizer is calling for a boycott of businesses tied to Republican politicians in wake of the Kansas Legislature’s endorsement of a constitutional amendment clarifying women in the state don’t have a right to abortion services.

The Kansas Senate affirmed a previous vote by the Kansas House to place on ballots in August 2022 the amendment to the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights. The amendment would reverse a Kansas Supreme Court decision in 2019 establishing that women had the right to make decisions about continuation of pregnancies.

Legislators opposed to the constitutional amendment said passage by Kansas voters would set the stage for an end to legal abortion even to save the life of the mother or for women who were victims of rape or incest.

The amendment, which cleared the Senate 28-11 and the House 86-38, was viewed by supporters as necessary to preserve decades of abortion regulations from judicial overreach.

Read more: https://kansasreflector.com/2021/01/30/kansas-abortion-amendment-inspires-call-for-boycott-of-republican-affiliated-businesses/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kansas abortion amendment inspires call for boycott of Republican-affiliated businesses (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2021 OP
Iowa House passed a similar bill last week SharonClark Jan 2021 #1
I don't know why the pro-choice groups don't add the Thirteenth Amendment to their arsenal. CrispyQ Jan 2021 #2
In New Mexico our legislature is gearing up to PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2021 #3
I'm glad to be right here in New Mexico with you! abqtommy Jan 2021 #6
That makes three of us. Desert grandma Jan 2021 #7
Hit em where it hurts soothsayer Jan 2021 #4
How about Oldem Jan 2021 #5

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
1. Iowa House passed a similar bill last week
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 02:15 PM
Jan 2021

and it goes to a Senate sub-committee this week.

Changing the state constitution to declare 1) there is no right to abortion and 2) no state funding for abortion services.

And another to declare any attempt to control guns is a violation if the state constitution.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
2. I don't know why the pro-choice groups don't add the Thirteenth Amendment to their arsenal.
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 02:20 PM
Jan 2021
Abortion and the 13th Amendment

2010
Forced Labor, Revisited: The Thirteenth Amendment and Abortion
Andrew Koppelman
Northwestern University School of Law, akoppelman@law.northwestern.edu

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1031&context=facultyworkingpapers

snip...

I. The basic argument The Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

My claim is that the amendment is violated by laws that prohibit abortion. When women are compelled to carry and bear children, they are subjected to "involuntary servitude" in violation of the amendment. Abortion prohibitions violate the Amendment's guarantee of personal liberty, because forced pregnancy and childbirth, by compelling the woman to serve the fetus, creates "that control by which the personal service of one man [sic] is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit which is the essence of involuntary servitude."6

Such laws violate the amendment's guarantee of equality, because forcing women to be mothers makes them into a servant caste, a group which, by virtue of a status of birth, is held subject to a special duty to serve others and not themselves.


Parents can't be compelled to donate their organs to their child, even to save the child's life. Why does a fetus have more claim on a woman's organs than her child who has been born?



THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION A WOMAN CAN MAKE ISN'T YOURS.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,848 posts)
3. In New Mexico our legislature is gearing up to
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 02:22 PM
Jan 2021

get rid of a 1969 law that doesn't allow abortions. Glad I live in a more progressive state, even though at my age (72) I'm not likely to be needing an abortion in the future.

Desert grandma

(804 posts)
7. That makes three of us.
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 04:14 PM
Jan 2021

Now, if we could only get rid of Yvette Harrell, that right wing Trumper, down south, things would be even better!

Oldem

(833 posts)
5. How about
Sun Jan 31, 2021, 03:00 PM
Jan 2021

boycotting such businesses on the simple grounds that they support repugs, period--on anything. I'm thinking of the recent post that recommended boycotting Publix because it's heiress supports the Stop the Steal lie. I think that one was resolved in Publix's favor. But what if we started a list of major businesses that support dump, seditionist repugs, etc. There are more of them than the pillow guy. Some owners of big sports teams, for instance.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Kansas»Kansas abortion amendment...