Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,102 posts)
Fri May 4, 2018, 05:36 PM May 2018

Judge: Neo-Nazi publisher could be liable for 'troll storm'

A neo-Nazi website's publisher could be held legally liable for the conduct of readers who carried out an anti-Semitic "troll storm" against a Montana real estate agent's family, a federal magistrate judge said in a court filing Thursday.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch recommends allowing Tanya Gersh to proceed with her lawsuit's claims against The Daily Stormer publisher Andrew Anglin.

Anglin's lawyers argue he has a constitutional right to express his "political speech" about Gersh and isn't liable for his readers' words or actions. But the magistrate said it isn't clear that Gersh's claims against Anglin are "barred as a matter of law" by the First Amendment.

Lynch's recommendation isn't the final word on Anglin's request to dismiss Gersh's case. Marc Randazza, one of Anglin's attorneys, said they "respectfully disagree" with the magistrate's conclusions and will ask a district court judge to review them.

Read more: https://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/2018/05/03/judge-neo-nazi-publisher-could-liable-troll-storm-andrew-anglin/579087002/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Neo-Nazi publisher could be liable for 'troll storm' (Original Post) TexasTowelie May 2018 OP
he wants to yell fire mercuryblues May 2018 #1
Yelling "fire" is free speech. It is not protected speech. Free speech is speech made without..... marble falls May 2018 #2

marble falls

(57,075 posts)
2. Yelling "fire" is free speech. It is not protected speech. Free speech is speech made without.....
Fri May 4, 2018, 10:02 PM
May 2018

prior restraint, whether the speech itself is protected or not. Stuff that RWers just do not get about the 1st Amendment.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Montana»Judge: Neo-Nazi publisher...