Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,912 posts)
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 04:34 AM Jul 2016

Nebraska ended last fiscal year with $95M less revenue than expected; Ricketts orders agencies to

Nebraska ended last fiscal year with $95M less revenue than expected; Ricketts orders agencies to tighten belts

LINCOLN — Nebraska ended its last fiscal year with $95 million less tax revenue than expected, according to a state report released Thursday.

In response, Gov. Pete Ricketts ordered state agencies to tighten their belts and watch their pennies during the fiscal year that began July 1.

But he said there is no need to call the State Legislature back to Lincoln for a special budget-cutting session.

Nor has he given up hopes of cutting taxes during the next two-year state budget period, which will start on July 1, 2017.

Read more: http://www.omaha.com/news/nebraska/nebraska-ended-last-fiscal-year-with-m-less-revenue-than/article_6b13d730-2211-5562-af1c-82da15ca4568.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nebraska ended last fiscal year with $95M less revenue than expected; Ricketts orders agencies to (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jul 2016 OP
Kansas going the way of Walkers Wisconsin riversedge Jul 2016 #1
Another good example of why a BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #2
I agree with your assessment wholeheartedly. TexasTowelie Jul 2016 #3
Thanks for the personal BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #4

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
2. Another good example of why a
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 06:21 AM
Jul 2016

successful businessman makes a horrible governor.

They think that they are running the state for the bottom line of mythical shareholders, but conveniently seem to forget that the ONLY "shareholders" they should be concerned about are actually the citizens of the state. These "shareholders" should be getting services of the state rather than dividends.

To the extent these nincompoops cannot deliver on such services, they are failures. Ricketts can join the long line of GOP Governor failures, although not all of them were businessmen in another incarnation. They are, however, ALL wedded to the "no new taxes," fees-for-services, and privatization-of-public-services ideology of today's Republican Party.

TexasTowelie

(111,912 posts)
3. I agree with your assessment wholeheartedly.
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 06:31 AM
Jul 2016

The functions of the private sector and the public sector have different goals. Maximizing profits for the stockholders and owners of businesses is the primary goal of private sector employers. Providing efficient and effective services to the people that need services is the goal of the public sector.

Therefore, I have very little sympathy when I hear some businessowner complain about having to wait in line when they renew their drivers license or pay a fine at the municipal court. They are receiving the service (or lack thereof) that they funded.

My brother also has some libertarian friends who believe that all government is bad--even while they are collecting an unemployment check and trying out how to put forth the least amount of effort possible to collect that check such as not meeting the minimum number of job contacts to collect their checks. One of those friends is already in hot water with the unemployment commission because he didn't report what he earned one week when he did some part-time work, while another was selected for the "random audit" because he failed to log into the state job site to at least give the appearance that he was looking for a job.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
4. Thanks for the personal
Fri Jul 15, 2016, 07:20 AM
Jul 2016

shares, TT!

I have one voting-age grandson (still living at home with his parents, incidentally) who seems to be enthralled by Libertarian beliefs right now, although not wholeheartedly wedded to them. As I recall, my undergraduate years were when I first learned about Ayn Rand, as "Anthem" was making the rounds.

After reading more, however, I really couldn't see the point of her so-called objectivist philosophy, finding it mostly nonsense and hypocrisy.

I believe that youth and his companions are more responsible for my grandson's leaning towards Libertarianism right now than anything else and that he will, in the end, make good choices. He is basically quite sweet and empathetic and certainly has better role models in the family than most of his friends do. But it is sad that too many of his friends function along the lines you describe, without ever seeing the irony.

What is tragic is that we have too many in - or seeking - elective office who have "R" after their names and who are essentially sociopaths. Trump, e.g., seems to tick every checkbox. http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Nebraska»Nebraska ended last fisca...