Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NV Congressional District 3: Oceguera D vs. Heck R (Original Post) JohnnyLib2 Sep 2012 OP
LVRJ poll said 53-40 Heck BUT.... Quiet_Dem_Mom Sep 2012 #1
good for Ralston JohnnyLib2 Sep 2012 #2

Quiet_Dem_Mom

(599 posts)
1. LVRJ poll said 53-40 Heck BUT....
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:38 PM
Sep 2012

It may be more in the toss-up area...hard to tell.

Jon Ralston (pol writer) noted some oddities in the demographics used in the poll. The Review-Journal is notoriously right-leaning and Ralston's called them out a few times on it--note the quotation marks around "newspaper" in his quote.

http://nvdems.com/index.php/posts/entry/press/there-they-go-again-ralston-slams-review-journals-severely-flawed-heck-oceg

From the website:

“----53 percent male vs. 47 percent female turnout. Really? I don't think so.



----Voter registration in CD3 is almost even, about 500 voters separating Democrats and Republicans among almost 295,000 registered. The breakdown in the poll: 37R, 32D. What?



----The voters surveyed cast ballots this way in the 2010 election: 49 percent Republican, 35 percent Democratic. Odd? I think so.



“I didn't think the "newspaper's" polling could get worse from 2010. But it may be slithering under that low bar. Oceguera may well be in a lot of trouble, but if this poll got to the right result, it's accidental.” [Ralston Flash, 9/14/2012]

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Nevada»NV Congressional District...