Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Pryderi

(6,772 posts)
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 01:05 PM Feb 2013

Harrisburg Marijuana Legalization Press Conference Feb 11th

HARRISBURG, February 8, 2013 – State Sen. Daylin Leach (D-Montgomery/Delaware) today announced plans to hold a marijuana legalization press conference on Monday, February 11 at 2 p.m. in the Capitol Media Center.

The press conference will feature representatives from the medical and law enforcement communities who support Leach’s bill and will give insight about the positive impacts the legislation would have. Speakers will include Neill Franlin, Executive Director, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition; and David Nathan, M.D., a clinical associate professor at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, who teaches and practices general adult psychiatry in Princeton, New Jersey.

Leach has been vocal about the benefits Pennsylvanians could reap by legalizing marijuana, most notably by bringing in much-needed tax revenue, providing a legal treatment alternative to patients suffering from terminal illness and finally ending a prohibition on a natural substance that causes no harm and cannot become the source of an addiction.

WHAT: Marijuana Legalization Press Conference

WHEN: Monday, February 11, 2013 at 2 p.m.

WHERE: Capitol Media Center in Harrisburg, PA
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harrisburg Marijuana Legalization Press Conference Feb 11th (Original Post) Pryderi Feb 2013 OP
The problem is the governor. Glassunion Feb 2013 #1
OK, then how much money can the industry come up with? Curmudgeoness Feb 2013 #2
That's the problem. There really is no industry yet. Glassunion Feb 2013 #3
Doesn't the legislation allow as many as 6 plants to be home grown? MrMickeysMom Feb 2013 #4
Does not matter what is in the legislation. Glassunion Feb 2013 #5
Well, you made sense with that... MrMickeysMom Feb 2013 #6

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
1. The problem is the governor.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 01:10 PM
Feb 2013

Unless he gets a big fat check from the industry he'll probably veto it down. If he does get the big fat check, he'll make sure the industry does not get taxed.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
3. That's the problem. There really is no industry yet.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 11:24 PM
Feb 2013

I personally despise big industry. They will ruin it, fill it with chemicals and unnecessary additives to make it cheaper, etc...

Basically to pay off Corbett we would simply need to take up a collection. I'm good for a couple a hundred. Just pass the hat around.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
4. Doesn't the legislation allow as many as 6 plants to be home grown?
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 12:25 AM
Feb 2013

That might increase the quality of what industry attempts to do.

If we did this right, hemp would be the greater and wider industry, including the nutritional benefits of the seeds.

Why the hell can't we get sustainable industries in the Commonwealth, damn it to heck?

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
5. Does not matter what is in the legislation.
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 12:45 PM
Feb 2013

Look at it like FRAC'ing.

Big oil put a lot of money into his campaign.

Big oil is drilling all over the state, and being taxed very little.

There is no "Big Pot" to put money into his next campaign. The industry does not exist. If however it did, and they line his next campaign pocket, he would have no problem signing the bill. Down side is that he would tax the industry very lightly.

Currently there is a lot of campaign money in keeping drugs illegal. Tech companies, firearm manufacturers, helicoptors, police groups, etc... All of these folks stand to make a lot of money fighting the war on drugs and they are big donors.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
6. Well, you made sense with that...
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 01:24 PM
Feb 2013

Much teeth gnashing aside, I have to look at this from "follow the money", which never seems to fail when examining the relationship of "de money" to campaign finance historical accounts.

The "war on drugs" is about as fruitful as the war on poverty was going to be, when LBJ announced it.

Why let the proletariat have a level playing field? Why, the very nature of the war on drugs depends upon it!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Harrisburg Marijuana Lega...