Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tanuki

(14,893 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:27 AM Jan 2014

TN lawmakers file bill to block ACA

More ALEC crap
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20140116/NEWS0201/301160051?source=nletter-top5

..."Several Middle Tennessee Republicans are taking on the Affordable Care Act, with a new bill that would bar state and local governments — and possibly also companies that do business with them — from buying health insurance through the federal website.

State Sen. Mae Beavers and three House Republicans released a bill Wednesday designed to stop President Barack Obama’s health care reform law by discouraging use of its health insurance exchange, HealthCare.gov.

The bill is sure to face formidable legal questions. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that the core of the Affordable Care Act was constitutional, and past attempts to stop the health care law in Tennessee have run aground because of the well-established constitutional principle that state laws cannot trump federal laws.

The bill would make it illegal for Tennessee and local officials to “assist in implementing” the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. It also would prohibit the state, local governments and educational institutions from buying coverage for their employees through the website."...

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TN lawmakers file bill to block ACA (Original Post) Tanuki Jan 2014 OP
It's early and I haven't had enough caffeine yet, House of Roberts Jan 2014 #1
Why shouldn't I have the right to use my government's website? Tanuki Jan 2014 #2
I am not defending anything. House of Roberts Jan 2014 #3

House of Roberts

(5,122 posts)
1. It's early and I haven't had enough caffeine yet,
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:58 AM
Jan 2014

but doesn't the law require all policies sold to adhere to certain minimum coverage standards?

If that is so, what difference does it make whether the insurance is obtained through the government website or direct from a company?

Tanuki

(14,893 posts)
2. Why shouldn't I have the right to use my government's website?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:31 AM
Jan 2014

For all the complaints about the website, at least it facilitated the process of identifying and comparing all of the options. We don't have a state exchange here, thanks to the RWers, and this is just one more way to sabotage access to affordable health care. They would do away with it altogether if they could. I can't imagine why you would defend this.

House of Roberts

(5,122 posts)
3. I am not defending anything.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:55 AM
Jan 2014

I asked a question.

As I read the article, it doesn't mention that the bill prohibits any individual from buying insurance through the federal exchange, unless you're on TennCare. If the state refused the federal money, fewer people would have coverage through that version of Medicaid, but those eligible would still get signed up one way or the other.

The hospitals are going to push back if they have to treat people without compensation, who would otherwise have had their bills covered.

I'm not sure the bill will stand up as constitutional anyway. The lawmakers can probably get away with making state and local governments go directly to insurance companies to obtain employee coverage. My question had to do with if the coverages had to meet the same minimum standard.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Tennessee»TN lawmakers file bill to...