HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Texas (Group) » Does anyone here know mor...

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:47 AM

 

Does anyone here know more on the backdrop of this story regarding Vermont dumping nuclear

waste in Texas? http://archives.texasobserver.org/issue/1998/09/11#page=11

5 replies, 954 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply Does anyone here know more on the backdrop of this story regarding Vermont dumping nuclear (Original post)
stevenleser Nov 2015 OP
stevenleser Nov 2015 #1
RandySF Nov 2015 #3
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #4
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #2
JimDandy Nov 2015 #5

Response to stevenleser (Original post)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:53 AM

1. Some more links on this...

 

Note: Politifact rates this as true but lacking some context

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/sep/22/fact-checking-viral-graphic-critical-bernie-sander/

Bangor Daily News article on this from 1998

http://archive.bangordailynews.com/1998/07/30/maine-vermont-nuclear-waste-compact-approved-by-house/

Maine-Vermont nuclear waste compact approved by House

By Paul Kane States News Service, Special to the BDN
This story was published on July 30, 1998 in all editions of the Bangor Daily News

WASHINGTON — The House approved Wednesday a deal that would allow Maine and Vermont to dump their low-level nuclear waste from places like the now-closed Maine Yankee in a poor Hispanic town in west Texas.

In a 305-117 vote, the House approved the compact without any of the troublesome amendments that had been previously attached to the tri-state deal, setting up a final showdown in the Senate that will determine its fate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:23 AM

3. "LARGELY ACCURATE"

"LACKING CONTEXT" readers to below issues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:35 AM

4. Here's another link:

It talks about the "environmental racism" of Sanders-sponsored legislation that allowed the dumping of Vermont nuclear waste into a mostly Latino border town in Texas, with the help of Bernie's BFF at the time, Dubya:
http://social-ecology.org/wp/1998/10/the-texas-vermont-maine-nuclear-dump-bringing-environmental-racism-home/

Chitown Kev provided a lot of info and links in this thread about it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251617475

Also, Sanders' wife, Jane, was a Commissioner on the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission - Vermont Compact.  Here’s the thread that talks about that, with lots of links in there too: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251621460

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Original post)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 02:07 AM

2. Apparently some people don't want you talking about it.

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Mon Nov 2, 2015, 10:44 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Why are Sanders supporters here so afraid of part of his history that they hid an OP about it?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251760223

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Disruptive meta. Whining about DU. The post was hidden because a jury felt it violated their community standards. We're not going to start threads whining every time something gets hidden. 

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Nov 2, 2015, 10:57 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agreed. Tiresome whining by Steven leser
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: on the surface this is innocuous enough, but it refers back to a rightfully hidden post. It becomes clear that this post is an extension of the piss taken in the previous...fruit of the poison pee, as it were.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: send an SoP alert, this isn't for a jury to decide
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Shining a little light on the hypocrisy running rampant on this site is a good thing.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If it is Meta, report it to the hosts to lock. It is not a hide-worthy offense.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stevenleser (Original post)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 03:11 AM

5. No, but the title is libelous for one thing.

Sanders never said "Drop Dead" or anything even close. And using that phrase in conjunction with nuclear waste was beyond tasteless. (and it was low-level waste like medical gloves) The reporters made a clumsy attempt at trying to be cute with a two-fer that implied Sanders had not just brushed off the marchers' concerns but had a callous disregard for the residents' health risks.

You're in the media business Steve. If you approve of that kind of writing, well, that says a lot about you. It deserved the hide.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread