Justices reject Houston appeal over benefits for gay spouses

[TexasTowelie]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has declined to step into a case over a Texas high court ruling that says gay spouses may not be entitled to government-subsidized workplace benefits.

The justices' action Monday comes without dissent or comment. It means a Texas court now will have to rule in a lawsuit from social conservatives who want to block spousal benefits for gay city employees in Houston.

The case follows the Supreme Court's 2015 decision extending same-sex marriage nationwide. One issue is whether that ruling means governments must provide the same benefits to all married employees.

Texas' Supreme Court said the justices did not decide that issue.

The Texas court reversed its earlier decision to stay out of the case after coming under pressure from Gov. Greg Abbott and other leading Republicans.

http://www.themonitor.com/news/state/article_4d9cd592-d904-11e7-90d1-c3c79bbcd9fe.html
(short article)

[cbreezen]

1. There's at least one "Roy Moore" in most states...

The wingnuts are shopping cases, in conservative venues, as they always have.

I don't believe this will change anything in the end. It is, however, great for generating money from religious donors, not to mention the lucrative lawyer fees to be had.