Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,938 posts)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 06:39 PM Jun 2013

Senate passes House redistrict maps

The Texas Senate approved political boundary maps for the House on Sunday, completing the initial task of the special legislative session that ends Tuesday.

The House-passed version of Senate Bill 3 makes at least six changes in the House boundary maps earlier approved by the Senate, ones that were drawn as interim maps by a San Antonio court. Republican leaders at the State Capitol now want to adopt those maps in hopes of avoiding a delay in primary election dates for the 2014 elections.

The vote was along party lines, 18-11, with Democrats voting no.

Sen. Kel Seliger, an Amarillo Republican who heads the Senate redistricting committee, said the changes were minor and agreed to in the House. The Senate generally goes along with changes the House wants in its political boundary maps, and vice versa.

More at http://www.statesman.com/news/news/senate-passes-house-redistrict-maps/nYSZM/ .

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate passes House redistrict maps (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jun 2013 OP
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #1
Record was made Gothmog Jun 2013 #2

Gothmog

(144,919 posts)
2. Record was made
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:21 PM
Jun 2013

The Democrats never had the votes to stop the redistricting maps once Dewhurst banned filibusters for these bills. The elimination of the filibuster was a very questionable move and will be used as evidence of discriminatory intent on appeal.

The main effort of the Democrats was to build a record for the San Antonio court to look at with respect to intentional discrimination. The Democrats did their a good job in this effort from what I could tell. There is now additional evidence in the legislative record showing discriminatory intent. Now the focus switches back to the courts.

Even if the SCOTUS strikes down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the Democrats still have a good chance of winning a Section 2 case due to the evidence of intentional discrimination.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Senate passes House redis...