Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumCarbon Bomb Pipeline Approved through WI, from Superior down to Illinois Border
First report I've seen about this:
http://www.popularresistance.org/while-u-s-waits-on-kxl-decision-a-new-tar-sands-pipeline-just-got-approved/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1002 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carbon Bomb Pipeline Approved through WI, from Superior down to Illinois Border (Original Post)
mojowork_n
Mar 2014
OP
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)1. I totally misread that
Thought it said Car Bomb Pipeline.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)2. Thats because the part that crosses the border had already been built
It is an expansion of existing line in Northern part at least
Flanagan Il and Superior WI will take Tar sands from Alberta out and on from those points
I thought it was to snake thru to OK then TX also?
anyway here is an old article
yes per IBT, KXL's evil twin
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-15/enbridge-s-oil-sands-pipeline-gains-from-delays-to-keystone-xl.html#p2
mojowork_n
(2,354 posts)3. I found some more, here
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/07/07/512140/tar-sands-giants-sneaky-new-playbook-revealed/
Big Oil has long employed deceptive tactics, but reeling from some recent setbacks, we are watching their new game plan come to light. With more than a million gallons of spilled tar sands crude still fouling Michigans Kalamazoo River since a spill nearly two years ago, the company behind that pipeline, Enbridge Energy Partners is now denying a plan to ship tar sands oil through New England.
Their departing CEO, Patrick Daniel, showed no remorse and gave no apologies for one of the biggest fossil fuel disasters in North America in history. Instead he sounded frustrated last week, saying he wishes the tar sands pipeline business hadnt become so controversial. Good riddance Mr. Daniel.
Last spring, his company announced a plan to reverse the direction of a pipeline called line 9, so that it could carry crude east rather than west. No big deal, right? What Enbridge didnt do was show all its cards. The real plan is to send dirty tar sands oil across several Great Lakes and New England states to Portland, Maine, for transfer by ship to refineries or for export. The project, called Trailbreaker, was floated two years ago, and then abandoned when the recession set in.
Their departing CEO, Patrick Daniel, showed no remorse and gave no apologies for one of the biggest fossil fuel disasters in North America in history. Instead he sounded frustrated last week, saying he wishes the tar sands pipeline business hadnt become so controversial. Good riddance Mr. Daniel.
Last spring, his company announced a plan to reverse the direction of a pipeline called line 9, so that it could carry crude east rather than west. No big deal, right? What Enbridge didnt do was show all its cards. The real plan is to send dirty tar sands oil across several Great Lakes and New England states to Portland, Maine, for transfer by ship to refineries or for export. The project, called Trailbreaker, was floated two years ago, and then abandoned when the recession set in.