Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 08:23 AM Dec 2014

Voter Fraud vs. Election Theft: The Wisconsin Scott Walker re-election

Hopefully someone with greater expertise in statistics will weigh in on this article ...

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/20/voter-fraud-vs-election-theft-the-wisconsin-scott-walker-re-election/

“Popular, oft-malfunctioning computer tabulator used in WI, many other states, tallied just 16 votes out of 5,350 cast in Stoughton, WI. Though some 5,350 voters are known to have voted in the city of Stoughton in Dane County, Wisconsin on Tuesday, just 16 of those voters were interested in voting in a local ballot referendum calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to help overturn the infamous Citizens United decision — at least according to the results reported by paper ballot optical-scan computer tabulators there.”

Thus, Charnin observes, “In 2010, Walker won by 124,638 votes with a 52.3 percent share. In 2012, he won the recall by 171,105 votes with 53.1 percent. But the True Vote Model (TVM) showed that he needed 23 percent of Obama returning voters to match the recorded vote. That is extremely implausible — and a red flag. It’s further evidence that Barrett won the election.”

...

In 2014, Charnin reports, Walker won with a 52.9 percent share. The exit poll was forced to match the bogus recorded vote by cutting returning Barrett voters to just 35 percent of 2014 voters, compared to Walker’s 50 percent. The 15 percent differential is much higher than the 7 percent Walker-recorded margin (8 percent discrepancy) and the 6 percent Barrett True Vote margin (a 21 percent discrepancy).

“When the returning voter mix is changed to a feasible Barrett 45/Walker 41 percent outcome,” he concludes, “Burke is the winner by 52.3-47.3 percent. The ‘How Voted in 2012’ crosstab vote shares are missing for Other (3 percent) and New Voters (DNV 11 percent). This is highly anomalous and another ‘tell’ that Walker stole the election.”
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
1. I have been sure this election was stolen
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:01 AM
Dec 2014

all along. We never hear anything about exit polls on the news anymore. Exit polls have been 100 percent accurate in calling elections.

What happened to them. This is no longer a democracy.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. If voters wanted him out, they had 3 chances.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:06 AM
Dec 2014

I don't think he can run again so in 4 years he is done.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. There are no term limits for the office.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:49 PM
Dec 2014

Tommy Thompson was elected to 4 terms: '86. '90,'94, & '98. He left office to join the Bush Cabinet in 2001.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
6. Veterans Today is not a reliable site
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:42 PM
Dec 2014

They publish too much total crap to be trustworthy. This analysis of the votes may be completely on target, but I'd want to see it from another source before I relied on it.

Archae

(46,318 posts)
9. Agreed. A number of vicious anti-Semitic articles are at "Veterans Today."
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 09:07 AM
Dec 2014

Especially articles saying the Mossad was behind 9-11.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
10. Given the testimony to Congress that our votes are being stolen electronically,
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 04:54 PM
Jan 2015

I go with suggestion no. 1 about what should be done 1) cast on paper and counted by hand: the highest confidence as well as least expensive with no technology to go wrong;


Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Voter Fraud vs. Election ...