Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:33 AM

Praek3 (149 posts)

Kloppenburg vs Bradley? Vote Kloppenburg!

Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Kloppenburg does not sleep with her clients. Bradley does sleep with her clients.

The choice is clear.

14 replies, 3954 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

14 replies	Author	Time	Post
Kloppenburg vs Bradley? Vote Kloppenburg! (Original post)	Praek3	Apr 2016	OP
A source for that outrageious claim would be useful ...	Scuba	Apr 2016	#1
Thank you Scuba	Praek3	Apr 2016	#2
You're welcome!!	Scuba	Apr 2016	#3
Don't you just love Republican "Family Values". As long as you are a racist corporate toady you.....	yourout	Apr 2016	#4
They can't find decent people to do their dirty work so we get Tim Russell and Rebecca Bradley.	Scuba	Apr 2016	#5
...and it looks like that smarmy turd Bradley is going to win.	Still In Wisconsin	Apr 2016	#8
Not looking good.	yourout	Apr 2016	#6
Yup. The Walker machine is alive and well. n/t	Still In Wisconsin	Apr 2016	#7
Staggering amount of stupid in this state.	yourout	Apr 2016	#9
It's getting very difficult to deny.	Still In Wisconsin	Apr 2016	#11
Shoot.......wanker's floozy looking to win this thing.	a kennedy	Apr 2016	#10
Once again, Republicans turned out to VOTE in much bigger numbers...	Still In Wisconsin	Apr 2016	#12
Not disputing your arguments at all but...	stevebreeze	Apr 2016	#13
I thought about that.	Still In Wisconsin	Apr 2016	#14

Response to Praek3 (Original post)

Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:58 AM

Scuba (53,475 posts)

1. A source for that outrageious claim would be useful ...

Boom!

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/bradley-extra-marital-affair-role-in-child-placement-surface-b99684605z1-371700831.html

Reply to this post

Response to Scuba (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:22 PM

Praek3 (149 posts)

2. Thank you Scuba

Reply to this post

Response to Praek3 (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 06:17 AM

Scuba (53,475 posts)

3. You're welcome!!

Reply to this post

Response to Scuba (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:49 PM

yourout (7,389 posts)

4. Don't you just love Republican "Family Values". As long as you are a racist corporate toady you.....

can sleep with whoever you want and we will still vote for you.

Reply to this post

Response to yourout (Reply #4)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:50 PM

Scuba (53,475 posts)

5. They can't find decent people to do their dirty work so we get Tim Russell and Rebecca Bradley.

Reply to this post

Response to Scuba (Reply #5)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:38 PM

Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)

8. ...and it looks like that smarmy turd Bradley is going to win.

Reply to this post

Response to Praek3 (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:05 PM

yourout (7,389 posts)

6. Not looking good.

turnout numbers look better for the Rs

Reply to this post

Response to yourout (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:31 PM

Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)

7. Yup. The Walker machine is alive and well. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Still In Wisconsin (Reply #7)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:59 PM

yourout (7,389 posts)

9. Staggering amount of stupid in this state.

Wississippi

Reply to this post

Response to yourout (Reply #9)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:25 PM

Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)

11. It's getting very difficult to deny.

The Republicans have done a great job of taking advantage of a comically inept state Dem party. That, and the Kochs deciding that we would be their petri dish for state-level takeovers six years ago has left this place unrecognizable to lifelong Wisconsinites.

Reply to this post

Response to Praek3 (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:02 PM

a kennedy (26,793 posts)

10. Shoot.......wanker's floozy looking to win this thing.

Reply to this post

Response to a kennedy (Reply #10)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:28 PM

Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)

12. Once again, Republicans turned out to VOTE in much bigger numbers...

look at the total vote numbers in the R primary. If people on our side can't be bothered to vote, then we have to live with the results. That, and it might help if we stopped running retread candidates. Nothing personally against Kloppenberg, who I truly believe would have made a wonderful SC Justice... but we've now run Barrett TWICE for Governor, Kloppenberg TWICE for SC... A combined 0-4.

Reply to this post

Response to Still In Wisconsin (Reply #12)

Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:19 PM

stevebreeze (1,869 posts)

13. Not disputing your arguments at all but...

How much difference might voter suppression have mattered in this race?

Reply to this post

Response to stevebreeze (Reply #13)

Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:36 AM

Still In Wisconsin (4,450 posts)

14. I thought about that.

The voter suppression tactics being used in this state are largely aimed at inner-city people of color-- these are the voters most affected by the voter ID stuff. That could have led to Clinton not performing quite as well as expected, as during this primary season POC have been her most reliable base.

Still, in past elections, the R's have been much, much better at getting ALL of their base to turn out and vote in primaries and off-year elections. I know the anti-Trump movement in the Milwaukee burbs was HUGE... I am sure that helped Bradley. I can't imagine anybody voter for Cruz and Kloppenberg.

Reply to this post

Wisconsin (Group)