Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumAct 10 Keeps "Saving" Taxpayers Money - The Corrections Edition
http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2013/08/act-10-keeps-saving-taxpayers-money.htmlOne statewide area that has also been hit extremely hard by Act 10 is the Department of Corrections. There has been a spike in assaults and injuries to correction officers. This led to a cover up and might eventually lead to Walker trying to privatize the system. But the corrections officers aren't sitting back and just taking it. They are fighting back in the only way left to them - the courts. And it looks like it will cost the taxpayers plenty (emphasis mine):
According to the lawsuit, the state Department of Corrections issued a policy on Jan. 29, 2012, stating that employees are considered on duty when they are present at their assigned post/work location prepared to assume their duties at their designated start time. But the guards allege it means they arent paid for pre-shift work that serves DOCs interests, such as passing a security screening, participating in roll calls and fitness for duty checks, checking out and receiving equipment and traveling through prisons to their assigned posts, all while being ready to respond to emergency calls. They also alleged they are not paid for post-shift work that includes communicating with relief officers, checking in work equipment and passing a security screening, again while being available for emergency calls.
The DOCs failure to pay guards for that time is willful and in bad faith, the lawsuit states.
A class action lawsuit was filed because Act 10, signed by Gov. Scott Walker in March 2011, removed collective bargaining as a means to resolve disputes like this one, the lawsuit states. Individuals lack the means to file separate lawsuits, which would also be expensive to the state, the lawsuit states. Wisconsin 2011 Act 10 prohibits members of the class from collectively negotiating with the DOC to seek redress over issues of wages, hours and working conditions, the lawsuit states. This leaves a class action complaint as a sole means to seek redress from a neutral decision-maker.
According to the lawsuit, the state Department of Corrections issued a policy on Jan. 29, 2012, stating that employees are considered on duty when they are present at their assigned post/work location prepared to assume their duties at their designated start time. But the guards allege it means they arent paid for pre-shift work that serves DOCs interests, such as passing a security screening, participating in roll calls and fitness for duty checks, checking out and receiving equipment and traveling through prisons to their assigned posts, all while being ready to respond to emergency calls. They also alleged they are not paid for post-shift work that includes communicating with relief officers, checking in work equipment and passing a security screening, again while being available for emergency calls.
The DOCs failure to pay guards for that time is willful and in bad faith, the lawsuit states.
A class action lawsuit was filed because Act 10, signed by Gov. Scott Walker in March 2011, removed collective bargaining as a means to resolve disputes like this one, the lawsuit states. Individuals lack the means to file separate lawsuits, which would also be expensive to the state, the lawsuit states. Wisconsin 2011 Act 10 prohibits members of the class from collectively negotiating with the DOC to seek redress over issues of wages, hours and working conditions, the lawsuit states. This leaves a class action complaint as a sole means to seek redress from a neutral decision-maker.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1661 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Act 10 Keeps "Saving" Taxpayers Money - The Corrections Edition (Original Post)
Scuba
Aug 2013
OP
Isn't this against the law to retaliate against workers for trying to better their work environment
midnight
Aug 2013
#3
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)1. FWIW, for the most part the prison guards supported the recall.
Some of this may be Walker's revenge for not letting themselves be split off from the rest of the state employees.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)2. Indeed they did. I have the pics to prove it!
midnight
(26,624 posts)3. Isn't this against the law to retaliate against workers for trying to better their work environment
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)4. That's what we used to think.
Turns out the law is actually whatever the teabag Guv, fascist gerrymandered legislature & Koch-owned Supreme Court of Wisconsin declare it to be.
midnight
(26,624 posts)5. This is the most lawless oath taking bunch.... If they can't uphold the law they need to leave.....
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)6. Apparently the voting machines of Waukesha County do not agree.
midnight
(26,624 posts)7. And that is a fact....
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)8. have a friend whose daughter works at walmart--ya i know.....
she has special needs and they seem to treat her very very well-she loves it.
anyway the point of this post is
Walmart is very careful now about making sure they do not do anything off the clock.
If she has a question for her boss, her boss makes sure it is on the clock.
so the off the clock lawsuits seem to have worked.
It is a pity that walmart can be held up as an example of good employer actions as opposed to the state of wisconsin