Canada

applegrove

(118,622 posts) Sun Oct 11, 2015, 10:01 PM Oct 2015

OKAY! okay BLUE JAYS! blue jays LET'S! - PLAY! - BALL!

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OKAY! okay BLUE JAYS! blue jays LET'S! - PLAY! - BALL! (Original Post) applegrove Oct 2015 OP

Sorry, I'm in Green Jay Country Xipe Totec Oct 2015 #1

Gorgeous bird! Nictuku Oct 2015 #2

Y'know what I hate...?? CanSocDem Oct 2015 #3

I paid no attention to the Jays but got sucked in by all the media and the excitement of those in my applegrove Oct 2015 #4

Well, I haven't watched regularly since 1993 laundry_queen Oct 2015 #5

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)

1. Sorry, I'm in Green Jay Country

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Sun Oct 11, 2015, 10:19 PM

Oct 2015

http://birdnote.org/video/2013/12/green-jay

http://birdnote.org/show/green-jays-and-santa-ana-national-wildlife-refuge

Nictuku

(3,605 posts)

2. Gorgeous bird!

Reply to Xipe Totec (Reply #1)

Sun Oct 11, 2015, 11:33 PM

Oct 2015

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)

3. Y'know what I hate...??

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 08:32 PM

Oct 2015

...feeling like it's my patriotic duty to cheer for the Blue Jays. All this "...our team, our time" BS. I liked it better when they were only interested in selling beer. Now that they're owned by a media conglomerate all they're selling is yappy opinionated assholes who never watched a game until this year.

If the Blue Jays win the AL, Barry Davis will wet his pants.

.

applegrove

(118,622 posts)

4. I paid no attention to the Jays but got sucked in by all the media and the excitement of those in my

Reply to CanSocDem (Reply #3)

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:15 PM

Oct 2015

family. Guilty.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)

5. Well, I haven't watched regularly since 1993

Reply to CanSocDem (Reply #3)

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:19 PM

Oct 2015

And am now watching again so I suppose that is almost as bad, LOL.

But I've noticed a bit of the OTT advertising and patriotic stuff. It's a bit much.

Still cheering for them though.

Reply to this discussion