Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 05:48 AM Jan 2013

'Insulting' to be dropped from section 5 of Public Order Act

The use of insulting language will no longer be illegal in cases in which a specific victim cannot be identified, the home secretary, Theresa May, has said.

In a government climb down, the Public Order Act that covers speech and writing on signs and states: "A person is guilty of an offence if he uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour", will be changed to remove the word insulting. The move follows a high-profile campaign which united Christian and secular groups and was spearheaded by the comedian Rowan Atkinson, the human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and the former shadow home secretary David Davis.

The push to change section five of the act followed a series of headline-grabbing arrests and prosecutions ranging from an Oxford student asking a police officer "Do you realise your horse is gay?" which Thames Valley police described as homophobic and "offensive to people passing by", to a 16 year old holding up a placard that said "Scientology is a dangerous cult".

In December, the government suffered a heavy defeat in the House of Lords which voted 150 votes to 54 in favour of an amendment to remove the word "insulting". Campaigners had complained the clause had been used by police as a "catch-all" offence to arrest people on trivial matters. It will continue to be illegal to use insulting language when an victim is clearly identifiable.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/14/insulting-section-5-public-order-act

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Insulting' to be dropped from section 5 of Public Order Act (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jan 2013 OP
Good; it'd be interesting to know what the convictions they did get said muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #1
Looks like the standard defense will become dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #2

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
1. Good; it'd be interesting to know what the convictions they did get said
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:08 AM
Jan 2013
"Looking at past cases the director of public prosecutions could not identify any where the behaviour leading to a conviction could not be described as abusive as well as insulting. He has stated that the word insulting could safely be removed without the risk of undermining the ability of the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] to bring prosecutions."


I wonder what the DPP did think of as abusive.
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»'Insulting' to be dropped...