HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Congress (Group) » House Backs Symbolic Meas...

Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:26 PM

House Backs Symbolic Measures to Oppose Oil Fee, Carbon Tax

Source: Associated Press

House Backs Symbolic Measures to Oppose Oil Fee, Carbon Tax


Reinforcing its opposition to President Barack Obama's environmental agenda, the Republican-controlled House on Friday approved symbolic measures declaring hostility to two liberal ideas on fossil fuels.

One measure disapproves of Obama's call for a $10-per-barrel fee on crude oil, while the other preemptively opposes a plan Obama has never advanced: a "carbon tax" on emissions from fossil fuels such as oil and coal.

The House approved the oil-fee measure Friday on a 253-144 vote. Lawmakers voted 237-163 to express the belief that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the U.S. economy.

Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 3 Republican in the House, said the oil fee and carbon tax are in line with the "radical rules and regulations" Obama has imposed.

Scalise denounced the Environmental Protection Agency, the IRS and the National Labor Relations Board "the whole alphabet soup of federal agencies that every morning wake up trying to figure out how to make it harder for our economy to get moving again."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/house-back-symbolic-measures-oppose-oil-fee-carbon-39762849

1 replies, 810 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply House Backs Symbolic Measures to Oppose Oil Fee, Carbon Tax (Original post)
Eugene Jun 2016 OP
Scootaloo Jun 2016 #1

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Jun 10, 2016, 03:30 PM

1. Were there any Democrats on Team Dead Dinosaur?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread