Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TMontoya

(369 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:04 AM Apr 2016

Since when is Hillary required to reach 2382 pledged delegates?

Where is this idea coming from that one must reach 2383 before the end of the primaries? She will most certainly have the required super delegates anyway so I just don't understand the logic?

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since when is Hillary required to reach 2382 pledged delegates? (Original Post) TMontoya Apr 2016 OP
Super delegates count the same as a pledged delegate. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1
Since Bernie found out delegates matter. nt kjones Apr 2016 #2
There are always different standards BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #3
They make it seem like you do TMontoya Apr 2016 #4
They are getting desperate and flailing BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #5
+1 nt brer cat Apr 2016 #13
The media has been pushing the horse race between BS and HRC because it makes for a better story. Fla Dem Apr 2016 #20
Since never. Obama used super delegates to reach the nomination number. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #6
She's not. They're just pathetically desperate at this point. Stand and Fight Apr 2016 #7
One more thing... Stand and Fight Apr 2016 #8
And one more thing... The number of pledged delegates is 4,051. Stand and Fight Apr 2016 #9
2026-1444 = 582 Her Sister Apr 2016 #17
which every candidate has the most pledged delegates, that is who the Super Delegates will support still_one Apr 2016 #10
She doesn't. They just like to make shit up. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #11
Very informative post KewlKat Apr 2016 #12
When their campaign leaders needed to raise the bar to protect Sanders Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #14
One rule for men, another rule for women Nonhlanhla Apr 2016 #15
Here's the thing... Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #16
That would be 59% of the pledged delegates. stopbush Apr 2016 #18
Desperation on the part of the Sanders campaign, refusing to face reality and admit... George II Apr 2016 #19
Since math sweetloukillbot Apr 2016 #21

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
3. There are always different standards
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:12 AM
Apr 2016

for Hillary. And there always have been. Period.

And no, it's not required that the 2383 include only "pledged" delegates. That is the total # required and can include both pledged and SDs. Obviously, if a candidate reaches that # in pledged delegates only, the SDs will also support that candidate. But there is no requirement for that to be the case and it certainly was not a requirement in 2008. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Process

 

TMontoya

(369 posts)
4. They make it seem like you do
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:14 AM
Apr 2016

To even think SDs will switch to Bernie is lunacy. Even if she is short by a hundred or so it won't matter because the SDs will put her over easily.

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
5. They are getting desperate and flailing
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:24 AM
Apr 2016

out at anything and anyone. Just because "they" say something doesn't make it so.

I can understand Bernie's being confused because he never has played by Democratic Party rules before. He's never had to follow rules as an Independent. Lone wolf status is what he is best at and which makes him highly improbable as an effective President. Jeff Weaver's previous political experience has been only with Bernie, not with the Democratic Party, so one can understand why he also finds the process frustrating and thus makes grandiose and inaccurate statements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Weaver_(politician)

I have much less sympathy for Tad Devine, who helped to create the SD system in the Dem Party and has been disingenuous at best about them, their role and his own role in their creation.

Fla Dem

(23,632 posts)
20. The media has been pushing the horse race between BS and HRC because it makes for a better story.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:08 AM
Apr 2016

So when comparing BS's delegate total to HRC's they're only including the pledged delegates won in an election or caucus.

Currently HRC has 1446 and BS has 1200 not counting Super Delegates.
HRC is short of the 2383 target by 937, BS is short by 1183.

If you include the Super Delegates:
HRC currently has 502 Super Delegates.
When added to her Pledged Delegates(1446) she has a total of 1948 delegates.
She only needs 435 Delegates to reach 2383 to clinch the nomination or just 26% of the remaining delegates.

She'll have her delegates, no worries.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
6. Since never. Obama used super delegates to reach the nomination number.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:33 AM
Apr 2016
http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/delegates/index.html


The Sanders campaign is trying to move the goalposts, but they are not movable. The rules are the rules.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
8. One more thing...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:46 AM
Apr 2016

They have this crazy delusion that between the last primary vote in DC on June 14 and the convention in mid-July, that they can get superdelegates to flip.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
9. And one more thing... The number of pledged delegates is 4,051.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:51 AM
Apr 2016

The goal is to have a majority of pledged delegates, which is 2,026 (half of 4,051 which is 2,025.5 rounded up) by the time of the convention. Hillary will likely have MORE than that, but without the supers she won't have the 2,383 until the first ballot. That's why candidates are known as the "presumptive" nominee, because unless something radical happens, they've cinched the nomination. After Tuesday -- and definitely by the time of the convention -- Hillary will have the delegates and she WILL BE the Democratic Party's nominee.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
17. 2026-1444 = 582
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 08:19 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:14 AM - Edit history (1)

She has 1444 pledged right now! So she'll need 582 more pledged delegates to reach 2,026 which is half and a majority.

After that she'll need 2,383 - 2,026 = 357 ! Which could be pledged or Super- Delegates.


BS has 1,205 Pledged Delegates. Difference is 239 b/w HRC and BS.

She has 479 Super Delegates at this moment. BS has 40 Super Delegates. There are 715 Super Delegates in Total.

There are 1,400 Pledged Delegates in the coming primary elections to be assigned. She only needs 582 or 42% of those to reach majority. He needs 821 or 58% (239+582 = 821). She is going to reach majority before BS! GAME OVER!

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:2016USDem

still_one

(92,116 posts)
10. which every candidate has the most pledged delegates, that is who the Super Delegates will support
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:57 AM
Apr 2016

and the way it should be

The super delegates reduce the need for a contested convention

The hypothetical game that the Sanders campaign is playing, by saying they will steal the SD won't happen

If the super delegates did support the candidate who DIDN'T get the most pledged delegates, that would be literally stealing the election from the candidate who got the most pledged delegates.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
14. When their campaign leaders needed to raise the bar to protect Sanders
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:18 AM
Apr 2016

If they "changed" the rules then Hillary has to have more pledged delegates to meet the required. Besides it to s still an opportunity to have a revolution. This is why I want to see vigorous primaries all the way, to bypass the pledged delegate count.

Stuckinthebush

(10,843 posts)
16. Here's the thing...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:58 AM
Apr 2016

It never has been an issue before. Real Democrats understand that you have to get a combination of delegates voted on by state democrats who agree to vote for a candidate (pledged), and party leaders from each state (supers).

When they call the roll at the convention, then the TOTAL votes for each candidate will be recorded - pledged and super.

The Sanders BS about only pledged matters shows an ignorance of the party system.

The real Democrat will wipe the floor with the BS.

stopbush

(24,395 posts)
18. That would be 59% of the pledged delegates.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:34 AM
Apr 2016

It's called Bernie Math.

See, if Hillary gets 58% of the pledged delegates while Sanders gets 42%, he wins the nomination.

George II

(67,782 posts)
19. Desperation on the part of the Sanders campaign, refusing to face reality and admit...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:41 AM
Apr 2016

...that they're chasing a lost cause.

First they said that the superdelegates MUST vote "the will of the people" otherwise it would be undemocratic.

Then when they realized that Clinton will have a majority of the pledged delegates (i.e., "the will of the people&quot , they now say but, but....the superdelegates haven't voted yet, and they might vote for Sanders.

So instantly the 2026 majority of pledged delegates becomes the 2383 majority of all delegates, and 700+ won't vote until the convention.

As I said, desperation and refusal to admit to reality or admit defeat.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Since when is Hillary req...