Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't know whether to laugh or cry (Original Post) geek tragedy Jun 2016 OP
There are those who always WhiteTara Jun 2016 #1
Really? ladym55 Jun 2016 #2
Think I'll hurl. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #3
The very model... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #4
I wish I had that kind of energy to think of new things to take offense at. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #5
Well, in fairness, there is a difference between donations and ticket prices for fundraisers. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #6
No, it's pretty much driven by the federal donation maximum. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #7
Maybe I'm just too jaded. I would have done it on purpose. lol TwilightZone Jun 2016 #10
I understand the desire to troll Sanders geek tragedy Jun 2016 #11
The first thought round here is corporate conspiracy. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #8
Bernie has been the ultimate victim candidate liberal N proud Jun 2016 #9
Is this Anger still? Treant Jun 2016 #12

ladym55

(2,577 posts)
2. Really?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jun 2016

We are burying 49 more gun violence victims this week and those folks are worrying about the donations at a Hillary fundraiser????

Could they perhaps turn their attention to the work of getting Dems into the White House, Senate, and Congress. To me, that seems rather clutch at this point.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
4. The very model...
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jun 2016

of a vile, nasty Hillary falsification narrative.

I wondered why Bernie was always going on and on about that $27 magical number?

At $27, you can donate 100 times to max the individual contribution limit.

Bernie won't need it - will he? - but in the general election season, the contribution limit of $2,700 starts over!

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
5. I wish I had that kind of energy to think of new things to take offense at.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:07 PM
Jun 2016

What's amazing is that nearly every single person who comes up with shit like that? Is always first on a thread about feminism or racism to say we are seeing things that aren't there.

But let's play numerology and find something to be outraged about! Bravo!

TwilightZone

(25,456 posts)
6. Well, in fairness, there is a difference between donations and ticket prices for fundraisers.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jun 2016

I think it's pretty obvious that the number was selected intentionally, but I think it's more intended as a playful jab at Sanders than an OMG-MIDDLE-FINGER gesture.

Politicians use all kinds of things to get people to attend fundraisers. The people freaking out about this should probably remember that they are opponents, after all. Welcome to politics.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. No, it's pretty much driven by the federal donation maximum.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jun 2016

really not that complicated.

Sanders is no longer an opponent, he's in the campaign's rear view mirror.

TwilightZone

(25,456 posts)
10. Maybe I'm just too jaded. I would have done it on purpose. lol
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

Politicians do all kinds of stuff to get people motivated, and I easily could see someone doing this.

I'll concede the point, though. The Sanders $27 thing was likely derived from the max and as others have noted, raising $2700/$27k etc., predates all of that.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
9. Bernie has been the ultimate victim candidate
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jun 2016

From rigged caucuses to closed primaries and Super Delegates and the list goes on.

Even shunned by the Pope.

Poor Bernie

Treant

(1,968 posts)
12. Is this Anger still?
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

I would've thought we'd move into Bargaining by now. Really.

I can't be the only one getting desperately tired of hearing about him. He lost, he's acting badly to stay in the news, but really...it's over, and he's yesterday's news. He has some slight remaining relevance until mid-July, but that's the end of it.

He's alienated too many people (including me, which is going some) to realistically head any effective "revolution." He had some good ideas, but now I'll wait until somebody else assumes the mantle. Elizabeth Warren, I'm looking at you here, although Brown or Blumenthal would be very nice, too.

Sorry for the rant.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»I don't know whether to l...