HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Hillary Clinton (Group) » Stakes get higher: Claren...

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:44 AM

 

Stakes get higher: Clarence Thomas may retire soon

As expected, the next president will determine the political leaning of the Supreme Court for decades. Rumors going around that Thomas is next. Crucial election for Democrats.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2594317/

13 replies, 2231 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to realmirage (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:47 AM

1. If Clarence retires before the end of the year I'll give him all my porn.

In fact I think we should start a movement "Porn for Clarence".

Given how closely attached to porn Clarence is, it just might provide a tipping point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz cook (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 07:22 AM

6. Won't work as an incentive

Justice Thomas wants to retire because he discovered the Internet. (wink)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PJMcK (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:58 PM

12. Heh nt

nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to realmirage (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:53 AM

2. I don't imagine he'd like to retire when Hillary is President but I hope it's so!

I can see the gop campaign ads now.. Let trump nominate the next SCOTUS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 07:02 AM

4. I think without his friend Scalia his heart just isn't in it.

 

Next POTUS might be choosing 3-4 SCOTUS... We got to get this right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Her Sister (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 07:07 AM

5. Yes we do.. it's not like it isn't time for the pendulum of Justice to swing in our direction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to realmirage (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 05:59 AM

3. Hmmm. Appoint ANITA HILL to his seat.

It would be a very small measure of justice for her. She was treated shamefully by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 08:15 AM

9. This is a funny, ironic and excellent suggestion!!!!

She would be an excellent member of the Supreme Court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 08:47 AM

10. Oh, god, would I love to see this. It would be faint justice for that upright woman

who had the courage to face all that and come out unbroken. Please, Hillary, nominate her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 11:40 AM

11. That would be the definition of

Poetic Justice!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MADem (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 21, 2016, 06:17 AM

13. I love it!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to realmirage (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 07:31 AM

7. Jeez will anyone notice?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to realmirage (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 07:49 AM

8. If the idea of naming 2 or more supreme court judges is NOT AMPLE REASON TO SUPPORT

 

our democratic nominee...then those people will deserve what will come more than those who vote for trump...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread