I Can Only Assume The MSM Had Tons Of Anti-HRC Stories Ready To Go

[stopbush]

in anticipation of the FBI recommending indictment.

Now, after they've spent all that $, planned their roll- out and hoped to influence the election, they come up with bupkis. They once again over-estimated their own intelligence, believed the spin that their supposed insider-dom gave them, only to be left with a bunch of nothing. We're talking about a recap of the Clinton "scandals" going back to whether Bill dodged the draft, Whitewater, Vince Foster, the whole nine yards. It would have been ugly and it would have been spectacularly devoid of truth and perspective.

And now, they have to chuck all that pre-sifted bullshit and try to report on a story that went 180° from what they in their great wisdom had decided would be the outcome.

Poor babies! No wonder they're trying to flag the embers sitting in the ashes of their stupidity.

Assholes.

[leftofcool]

1. What shall we call this new probe ya think?

Investigationgate? Comeygate? FBIgate?

[Her Sister]

2. "over-estimated their own intelligence"

I like this a lot!

over-estimated their own intelligence

and they keep doing that and doing...

[KittyWampus]

3. I'm certain they have a "mad lib" type sheet for Clinton and all Democrats...

just fill in the blanks with nouns, verbs adjectives for loads of "fun".

[Cha]

4. I read they were still anti-Hillary all day yesterday.

[Thinkingabout]

5. It could be called SPEND SPEND SPEND.