Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBreaking News: Clinton email server secure - never hacked.
New York Times:
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clintons assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments.
[link:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/security-logs-of-hillary-clintons-email-server-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0|
pbmus
(12,418 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)what was perfectly okay, is suddenly criminal. Can't make this sh*t up.
Thanks to U$ Media, this non-scandal is being sold as a scandal as they watch her polls. If they did have the persecution on Rubio and Cruz as they do Hillary Clinton, they'd look ten times worse because there is real scandal on that side! Instead, they handle Repubs with kid gloves and take a baseball bat to anything Clinton.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Like Joe Scarborough, of course Trey Gaudy already knew they were just spending money without a reason.
Response to kstewart33 (Original post)
Post removed
ismnotwasm
(41,921 posts)I can't believe they've mild it this long--but then again, nothing surprises me when it comes to those guys. Nothing.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)again vindicated I see!
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Republican, Republican, Republican.
Dollars to donuts, had her server been hacked, you'd hear it 24/7, commercial, then 24/7 about it.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)stonecutter357
(12,682 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Howard Fineman and former federal prosecutor Laura Coates with Chris Matthews discuss the emails situation in this video from last night.
CM asks what is the worst case scenario: Fineman tries to insinuate that she is a spy giving away secrets. CM asks why would she do that? Exactly so stupid. Coates can tell that is ridiculous ans says that the question is whether she made information vulnerable, not give away information and she doesn't think HRC will be prosecuted.
Conversation is from 18:00 to 24:00 in this video:
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Yes - it is, has been, and always will be something put out by the rightwing spin machine.
Endless speculation and innuendo.
But what catches fire?
Whatever 'the left' views as 'credible' even if it is just another useful tool to bash Hillary.
We need to stop giving this BS any scent of credibility.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Despite immunity buzz, there is no FBI or DOJ email investigation of Hillary Clinton
"What is being investigated is the security of the official email server at the State Department, and why the last three Secretaries of State have all refused to use it. The FBI asked all three of them for their private email servers so it can determine why the official State server was so much less secure."
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)"Studying how Hillarys email server was set up required the help of the techie who built it, but he refused to cooperate because he didnt want to risk becoming a pawn in a political investigation in an election year. He wanted immunity, but they didnt want to give it to him because he wasnt being accused of anything to begin with. But now the Department of Justice has finally given him immunity so hell feel comfortable helping them out, just to get the investigation over with. Again, this is an investigation that Hillary is not a target of."
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)for all the great information you provided.