Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumWhy Hillary Clinton’s delegate lead over Bernie Sanders is bigger than it looks
The Clinton lead over Sanders in 2016 is actually far greater than the Obama lead over Clinton in 2008 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/14/why-hillary-clintons-delegate-lead-over-bernie-sanders-is-bigger-than-it-looks/
But here's the thing: Whether or not Clinton wins Ohio doesn't really matter.
It's important to remember that the Democrats, unlike the Republicans, don't allocate delegates on a winner-take-all basis. When Donald Trump won South Carolina with a plurality of the vote, he got all of the state's 50 delegates, a total that right now constitutes more than half of his lead. There are no states like that on the Democratic side. There are some variations in how the states divvy up their delegates, but they're proportionally distributed from now until the primary is over.
Which is why the 2008 daily delegate totals looked like this.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
As Clinton tried to play catch-up with Barack Obama, he would get some delegates every time she did. The only times she made big gains against him was in states she won by a wide margin. But the proportional delegate system kept Obama steadily out of reach.
It's worth comparing Obama's 2008 lead in the delegates to Clinton's. Clinton, by virtue of huge margins of victory in Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, has a much bigger lead than Obama did at this point -- or than Obama did at any point. (The data below excludes superdelegates.)
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
It's important to remember that the Democrats, unlike the Republicans, don't allocate delegates on a winner-take-all basis. When Donald Trump won South Carolina with a plurality of the vote, he got all of the state's 50 delegates, a total that right now constitutes more than half of his lead. There are no states like that on the Democratic side. There are some variations in how the states divvy up their delegates, but they're proportionally distributed from now until the primary is over.
Which is why the 2008 daily delegate totals looked like this.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
As Clinton tried to play catch-up with Barack Obama, he would get some delegates every time she did. The only times she made big gains against him was in states she won by a wide margin. But the proportional delegate system kept Obama steadily out of reach.
It's worth comparing Obama's 2008 lead in the delegates to Clinton's. Clinton, by virtue of huge margins of victory in Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, has a much bigger lead than Obama did at this point -- or than Obama did at any point. (The data below excludes superdelegates.)
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
Even without super delegates, Clinton has a far greater lead over Sanders compared to the lead that President Obama had over Clinton in 2008
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1736 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (33)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hillary Clinton’s delegate lead over Bernie Sanders is bigger than it looks (Original Post)
Gothmog
Mar 2016
OP
Every contest makes it more and more difficult for her opponent to overcome the deficit.
MADem
Mar 2016
#4
Or the super delegate was going to change their minds and vote for Sanders, don't think
Thinkingabout
Mar 2016
#7
What you are saying is that 2016 is most definitely NOT "just like 2008"! Good job.
George II
Mar 2016
#9
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)1. K&R
BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)2. Thanks for the information,
Gothmog AND the graphics! K & R!
UrbScotty
(23,980 posts)3. That lead will almost certainly grow tomorrow!
Even if the other states are close (or Bernie wins), Florida and North Carolina will likely help her add to her lead.
MADem
(135,425 posts)4. Every contest makes it more and more difficult for her opponent to overcome the deficit.
I am hoping for a good showing tomorrow.
Cha
(297,054 posts)5. Yeah, I know it's bigger! Thank you, Gothmog!
It's funny. Just weeks ago the Sanders supporters were saying constantly that this contest was just like 2008. Not so much anymote
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)7. Or the super delegate was going to change their minds and vote for Sanders, don't think
he will be able to pick up enough super delegates to swing the convention for Sanders.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)8. I love your posts, Gothmog.
Classy, informative, spot on.
George II
(67,782 posts)9. What you are saying is that 2016 is most definitely NOT "just like 2008"! Good job.