Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,063 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:32 PM Mar 2016

Why Hillary Clinton’s delegate lead over Bernie Sanders is bigger than it looks

The Clinton lead over Sanders in 2016 is actually far greater than the Obama lead over Clinton in 2008 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/14/why-hillary-clintons-delegate-lead-over-bernie-sanders-is-bigger-than-it-looks/

But here's the thing: Whether or not Clinton wins Ohio doesn't really matter.

It's important to remember that the Democrats, unlike the Republicans, don't allocate delegates on a winner-take-all basis. When Donald Trump won South Carolina with a plurality of the vote, he got all of the state's 50 delegates, a total that right now constitutes more than half of his lead. There are no states like that on the Democratic side. There are some variations in how the states divvy up their delegates, but they're proportionally distributed from now until the primary is over.

Which is why the 2008 daily delegate totals looked like this.

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484

As Clinton tried to play catch-up with Barack Obama, he would get some delegates every time she did. The only times she made big gains against him was in states she won by a wide margin. But the proportional delegate system kept Obama steadily out of reach.

It's worth comparing Obama's 2008 lead in the delegates to Clinton's. Clinton, by virtue of huge margins of victory in Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, has a much bigger lead than Obama did at this point -- or than Obama did at any point. (The data below excludes superdelegates.)
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484

Even without super delegates, Clinton has a far greater lead over Sanders compared to the lead that President Obama had over Clinton in 2008
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hillary Clinton’s delegate lead over Bernie Sanders is bigger than it looks (Original Post) Gothmog Mar 2016 OP
K&R Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #1
Thanks for the information, BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #2
That lead will almost certainly grow tomorrow! UrbScotty Mar 2016 #3
Every contest makes it more and more difficult for her opponent to overcome the deficit. MADem Mar 2016 #4
Yeah, I know it's bigger! Thank you, Gothmog! Cha Mar 2016 #5
2008 enid602 Mar 2016 #6
Or the super delegate was going to change their minds and vote for Sanders, don't think Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #7
I love your posts, Gothmog. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #8
What you are saying is that 2016 is most definitely NOT "just like 2008"! Good job. George II Mar 2016 #9

UrbScotty

(23,980 posts)
3. That lead will almost certainly grow tomorrow!
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:36 PM
Mar 2016

Even if the other states are close (or Bernie wins), Florida and North Carolina will likely help her add to her lead.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. Every contest makes it more and more difficult for her opponent to overcome the deficit.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:37 PM
Mar 2016

I am hoping for a good showing tomorrow.

enid602

(8,607 posts)
6. 2008
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:33 PM
Mar 2016

It's funny. Just weeks ago the Sanders supporters were saying constantly that this contest was just like 2008. Not so much anymote

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
7. Or the super delegate was going to change their minds and vote for Sanders, don't think
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:05 PM
Mar 2016

he will be able to pick up enough super delegates to swing the convention for Sanders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Why Hillary Clinton’s del...