Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton is fundamentally honest--and trustworthy
No shock to me. Sanders fans--most will mock this without reading-I am sure.. Probably there is not a day that goes by where I see--a comment saying she belongs in prison in other du forums.
TWEET:
This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/this-may-shock-you-hillary-clinton-is-fundamentally-honest/
Jill Abramson, The Guardian
28 Mar 2016 at 08:38 ET
Its impossible to miss the Hillary for Prison signs at Trump rallies. At one of the Democratic debates, the moderator asked Hillary Clinton whether she would drop out of the race if she were indicted over her private email server. Oh for goodness that is not going to happen, she said. Im not even going to answer that question.
Based on what I know about the emails, the idea of her being indicted or going to prison is nonsensical. Nonetheless, the belief that Clinton is dishonest and untrustworthy is pervasive. A recent New York Times-CBS poll found that 40% of Democrats say she cannot be trusted.
For decades shes been portrayed as a Lady Macbeth involved in nefarious plots, branded as a congenital liar and accused of covering up her husbands misconduct, from Arkansas to Monica Lewinsky. Some of this is sexist caricature............
I would be dead rich, to adapt an infamous Clinton phrase , if I could bill for all the hours Ive spent covering just about every scandal that has enveloped the Clinton's. As an editor Ive launched investigations into her business dealings, her fundraising, her foundation and her marriage. As a reporter my stories stretch back to Whitewater. Im not a favorite in Hillaryland. That makes what I want to say next surprising.
Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy.
.............
The yardsticks I use for measuring a politicians honesty are pretty simple. Ever since I was an investigative reporter covering the nexus of money and politics, Ive looked for connections between money (including campaign donations, loans, Super Pac funds, speaking fees, foundation ties) and official actions. Im on the lookout for lies, scrutinizing statements candidates make in the heat of an election......
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)HRC GROUP HERE! newbie! and your nope! woah! that was some awesome.
stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)riversedge
(70,187 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)I have seen a change in most HRC supporters here and in other websites towards BS.
BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)No matter. For me, you are gone forever!
rock
(13,218 posts)Ask a bunch of strangers.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)It's why she is getting more votes than anyone...
Plus we know she is the smartest, most qualified candidate running.
HRC GROUP READY FOR HER!!
riversedge
(70,187 posts)538: Clinton has an 84% chance of winning the Wisconsin primary. Polls plus
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/wisconsin-democratic/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1980 on Sanders. If the non scandals by the GOP is proof of non trustworthy, this would be far from the truth.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)Are usually anything but.