Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:18 AM Mar 2016

My fellow #Imwithher supporters.

Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:10 AM - Edit history (1)

I’ve got two names for you. Al Franken and Ted Kennedy.

To say that I’m done listening to the criticism of the democratic party is an understatement. It’s jaw dropping to listen to those who are demanding a political revolution to insinuate that President Obama or the democratic party has not done enough or that we’ve lost our way.

In the modern era, our party has never been stronger. Our bench has never been deeper, our fellow Americans know it and it’s why they trust us to lead and not republicans. We have achieved a great deal in the last eight years, thanks to the leadership of President Obama and his team-which includes Hillary.

956,733 miles traveled, 112 countries visited in four years, 401 days of travel, US international relationships rebuilt… And her DU criticizers want to talk about email. WHAT A JOKE! It’s a Karl Rove tactic, attacking someones strength and it's infuriating to see on DU!

Pay no mind to these people, where were they in 2010? WHERE? Where was Sanders when we were trying to fight off the Tea Party? Where was his political revolution then?

I am damn proud of President Obama! I am damn proud of Nancy Pelosi, I am damn proud of Harry Reid! We’ve achieved great things in era of Obama. We did the work and we have a great list of achievements to show for it. Give the haters the bird! Where are their accomplishments?

Let me remind you of this. In 2009, after the President and the democratic congress was sworn in, we had 59 senate seats. 59. Al Franken was sworn into the U.S. Senate on July 7, 2009 due to the contested senate race in Minnesota with Norm Coleman. Ted Kennedy died of a brain tumor on August 25, 2009.

Get that?

That’s how long we had as a filibuster proof majority. Sure there was Paul Kirk who Governor Deval Patrick appointed in the interim, but even he was only there September 24, 2009 – February 4, 2010. February 4th 2010 is the day that Republican Senator Scott Brown was sworn into office, which would not have happened if “political revolutionaries” would have showed up to vote for the democrat. WHERE. WERE. THEY?

All of our major legislative achievements happened in less than half of a congressional term, if that is not considered historic and extremely successful, nothing ever will be! What we achieved in that tiny amount of time is massively monumental!

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My fellow #Imwithher supporters. (Original Post) Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 OP
Sounds exactly like this.. Cha Mar 2016 #1
Hiya Cha! Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #2
I bet it felt really good, Gary.. It's important to get our Cha Mar 2016 #3
Plus as proven in the last few years by the TP the purist fail to function Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #12
The purists do fail to function.. what exactly did BS accomplish the last 25 years in Congress.. Cha Mar 2016 #13
When I think about the great Ted Kennedy, he knew how to govern, he worked with others, and he Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #14
Thanks for this, Cha! pandr32 Mar 2016 #18
Totally nails 'em.. you're Welcome, pandr! Cha Mar 2016 #19
Great post LuvLoogie Mar 2016 #4
+1000 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #5
Where was Sanders? MarianJack Mar 2016 #6
Thanks, Gary. This post is just what I needed. The negativity sometimes gets me down. Arkansas Granny Mar 2016 #7
Bravo!! brer cat Mar 2016 #8
Thank you Gary! Great post and a nice positive boost livetohike Mar 2016 #9
Well said. sufrommich Mar 2016 #10
Proven failure, we need a working congress, members who work with others well, we are a nation Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #15
I think it's precisely why she is going to rock the general like we've not seen in a very long time. Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #25
Hear hear!! n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #11
K & R, great post. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #16
K&R! DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #17
Excellent post! pandr32 Mar 2016 #20
I feel the same. Thanks pandr32 Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #23
K&R radical noodle Mar 2016 #21
It wouldn't surprise me. Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #22
Well said! mcar Mar 2016 #24

Cha

(297,157 posts)
1. Sounds exactly like this..
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:34 AM
Mar 2016
Emo Progressive

Note: This term was seen as divisive and has been superseded by Puritopian.

Emo Progressive (or "emoprog&quot is a self-described liberal or progressive, often with libertarian leanings, whose political orientation is to be angry, dissatisfied and unhappy with the state of the nation at any given time, because in their view, liberal policies are not being implemented quickly or forcefully enough. They have particular contempt for Democratic presidents.

Emoprogs are ideological purists who disdain compromise and incremental change, which they see as "selling out" liberal ideas like full employment, an end to all wars, state secrets, and liberal social policy.

Emoprogs dislike Republicans but reserve their greatest disdain for Democratic presidents, whom they relentlessly attack for not meeting a set of ideological goal posts that are constantly adjusted to ensure that the president will be deemed a disappointment, "not progressive enough" or "just like a Republican" no matter what policy achievements are made.

Emoprogs routinely dismiss or ignore congress' role in making or impeding policy, believing presidents can simply "use the bully pulpit" and "fight" in order to overcome constitutional or legislative obstacles.

Emoprogs have a strong affinity for 3rd party politics as a way to punish Democratic presidents. They are especially hostile to President Obama and deem anyone who expresses a lack of ill will toward him to be "Obamabots" and enemies of liberalism.

I'll take the slow steady progress and solid foundation of President Obama and Hillary Clinton over the blowing up of the Dem party to get trump elected and our Democracy to smithereens.

Thankfully most of the country recognizes the progress of President Obama as he is @ 53% percemt today.. that's post the Belgium terrorist attack.

Thank you, Gary!

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
2. Hiya Cha!
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:41 AM
Mar 2016


I will admit that it felt really good to write this OP, it's so frustrating to see members of DU use GOP talking points. Yes, I'm with you my friend, I will take slow and steady any day over the alternative. The man who shall not me named other than the Tan Toupe must be kept as far away from the oval office.

Cha

(297,157 posts)
3. I bet it felt really good, Gary.. It's important to get our
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:53 AM
Mar 2016

thoughts out on this whole emoprog attack on our President and Hillary!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
12. Plus as proven in the last few years by the TP the purist fail to function
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:56 AM
Mar 2016

In governing, accomplish nothing, we have had enough of a do nothing congress.

Cha

(297,157 posts)
13. The purists do fail to function.. what exactly did BS accomplish the last 25 years in Congress..
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:02 AM
Mar 2016

And, sorry.. I forgot to add a link to the emoprog definition.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Emo%20Progressive

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
14. When I think about the great Ted Kennedy, he knew how to govern, he worked with others, and he
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:08 AM
Mar 2016

did not fail and knew how to negotiate in order to get bills passed and this included working with others.

pandr32

(11,581 posts)
18. Thanks for this, Cha!
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:42 AM
Mar 2016

You know what they say--"if the shoe fits!" and it sure does. This nails the Sanders supporters, especially the ones here.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
15. Proven failure, we need a working congress, members who work with others well, we are a nation
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016

of individuals but as our name implies we are United.

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
25. I think it's precisely why she is going to rock the general like we've not seen in a very long time.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:45 PM
Mar 2016

People are so sick of this ridiculous gridlock. I consider myself a progressive like the best of us, but I too am a progressive that likes to get things done. These ideologist are destroying our country, we need to work together and I believe that we can do so without destroying our planet.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
21. K&R
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:54 PM
Mar 2016

And that same bunch will be MIA again in 2018 and then complain about the "establishment" not doing what they promised.

Fantastic OP!

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
22. It wouldn't surprise me.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:39 PM
Mar 2016

Although Sander's has stated on the record that if he does not win the nomination, then he will spend his career "rebuilding" the democratic party. Basically if he looses, he will do what Hillary has been doing all along...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»My fellow #Imwithher supp...