Latin America
Related: About this forumObama’s Sanctimonious Human Rights Argument Against Cuba
September 23, 2014
Unbalanced Law?
Obamas Sanctimonious Human Rights Argument Against Cuba
by MATT PEPPE
Raúl Castro, President of Cuba, said that he wants to start relations with the U.S., but first the U.S. must provide health insurance to all 46 million people who lack it; stop extrajudicial assassinations in sovereign countries through drone attacks; make higher education affordable for all; reform the prison system which has by far the highest incarceration rate in the entire world, with a drastically disproportionate amount of prisoners being minorities; grant Puerto Rico its sovereignty as required by the U.N. Charter, U.N. Declaration on Decolonization, and the popular referendum in Puerto Rico in 2012; halt the economic blockade, which has been ruled illegal for 22 straight years in the U.N.; close the Guantánamo Bay detention facility and return the land to Cuba; turn overterrorists living freely in Miami who have bombed Cuban civilian airplanes, hotels and fishing boats; and free the three political prisoners who were investigating these groups to prevent further attacks.
Actually, he said: We dont demand that the U.S. change its political or social system and we dont accept negotiations over ours. If we really want to move our bilateral relations forward, well have to learn to respect our differences, if not, were ready to take another 55 years in the same situation.
President Barack Obama has said Cuba: Has not yet observed basic human rights
I and the American people will welcome the time when the Cuban people have the freedom to live their lives, choose their leaders, and fully participate in this global economy and international institutions. But he added: We havent gotten there yet.
Presumably Obama means when Cuba agrees to relinquish their right to self-determination, as guaranteed in the U.N. Charter, to join the U.S.-imposed neoliberal order. When Cuba to gives up state control over industries like banking and telecommunications and opens them up to foreign investment, so more money can be shipped off the island instead of staying in the local economy and invested in the Cuban people. When Cuba agrees to free trade agreements, which would prevent labor and environmental safeguards while forcing local businesses to compete on an uneven playing field with multinational corporations that receive government subsidies, allowing them to undercut the price of local products. In short, when Cuba decides to respect private profit over the social welfare of its population.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/09/23/obamas-sanctimonious-human-rights-argument-against-cuba/
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)but it can hold a grudge for 50 years, if the Cosa Nostra was slighted or ripped off....
US relations with Cuba were anything but peaceful, honorable, and friendly before Castro came along. Same old, same old. How dare the Cubans insist on a national identity and people-centered government?
Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)We sure wouldn't want to criticise that. Democrats support Obama, not Castro chavistas
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Sort of going back to that log in your own eye thingee. And giant balls.