Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latin America

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts) Thu Jul 28, 2016, 08:37 AM Jul 2016

75% want a Venezuelan pre-Chavez, 64% believe chavez/maduro reign the biggest error in history

https://dolartoday.com/maduro-acabo-con-el-legado-ultima-encuesta-como-el-mas-grave-error-de-la-historia-califican-los-venezolanos-al-chavismo/

more on survey here in Spanish

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

75% want a Venezuelan pre-Chavez, 64% believe chavez/maduro reign the biggest error in history (Original Post) Bacchus4.0 Jul 2016 OP

Yay socialism eom rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #1

It looks like they're in for (another) disappointment COLGATE4 Jul 2016 #2

Its survival. A recall means the end of chavismo nt Bacchus4.0 Jul 2016 #3

Yep. A recall also means the end of Maduro. I don't think he gives COLGATE4 Jul 2016 #4

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)

1. Yay socialism eom

Reply to Bacchus4.0 (Original post)

Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:09 AM

Jul 2016

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)

2. It looks like they're in for (another) disappointment

Reply to Bacchus4.0 (Original post)

Thu Jul 28, 2016, 09:51 AM

Jul 2016

as Maduro ponders the ways to do away with a recall.

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts)

3. Its survival. A recall means the end of chavismo nt

Reply to COLGATE4 (Reply #2)

Thu Jul 28, 2016, 10:06 AM

Jul 2016

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)

4. Yep. A recall also means the end of Maduro. I don't think he gives

Reply to Bacchus4.0 (Reply #3)

Thu Jul 28, 2016, 01:52 PM

Jul 2016

a flying fuck about Chavismo and he certainly doesn't about the Venezuelan people. Right now he's in survival mode, which makes him all the more dangerous.

Reply to this discussion