Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sandensea

(21,596 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 12:05 AM Jul 2019

International Macri Fund: IMF approves another $5.4 billion for Argentina

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) board of directors today approved releasing to Argentina a $5.4 billion tranche from a stand-by credit line granted last year as a bailout to deal with the country's debt crisis.

The latest tranche, the fifth since the bailout was agreed to in June 2018 with President Mauricio Macri, will bring the total disbursed thus far to $44.5 billion.

The $57 billion credit line is the largest in the Fund's history and makes up 61% of its loan portfolio - leading Argentine critics to refer to the IMF as the "International Macri Fund."

The approval comes despite earlier misgivings by IMF acting Managing Director David Lipton, 65, who as Deputy Managing Director until the July 2 resignation of Christine Lagarde had objected to Macri's use of the credit line to finance capital flight.

Of the $39 billion disbursed during the bailout's first year, $30 billion were lost to speculative capital flight.

"Article VI of the IMF states that no member may use the Fund's general resources to face capital flight," opposition candidate Alberto Fernández pointed out.

"The objectives set at the time the loan was granted have been absolutely distorted."

The bailout, however, is strongly supported by U.S. President Donald Trump, who shares both a political affinity and longstanding friendship with the Argentine president.

Fernández, who leads in most polls, has accused the IMF of "financing Macri's campaign by indebting Argentina."

He, as well as centrist candidate Roberto Lavagna (currently in third place), have called for a rescheduling of the IMF debt, most of which is due in just two years: 2022 and '23.

From bubble to bailout

Including massive bond debts taken on by Macri in 2016-18, the next administration (2019-23) faces around $150 billion in foreign debt payments.

Macri turned to the IMF - who had supported his policies - when a $60 billion carry-trade debt bubble known locally as the "financial bicycle" collapsed in April 2018.

The crisis cut off Argentina's access to foreign credit markets, and forced the central bank to raise interest rates.

The ensuing recession - the second since Macri took office in 2015 - has led to a 5.8% fall in GDP, a 24.6% collapse in fixed investment, and 261,000 registered job losses.

Inflation has meanwhile risen to 57.4% - the highest since 1991.

At: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagina12.com.ar%2F206002-la-cuerda-del-fmi-para-tirar-otros-dos-meses



An elated Argentine President Mauricio Macri and acting IMF Managing Director David Lipton.

As Deputy Managing Director under his predecessor, Christine Lagarde, Lipton objected to Macri's use of the $57 billion IMF credit line to finance capital flight - a use the Fund's Article VI explicitly bars.

In his new post however, Lipton has yielded to pressure by President Donald Trump to rubber-stamp all loans to Argentina in a bid to prop up Macri (who's behind in most polls).

Critics warn that Trump's insistence is setting the stage for a likely default by Argentina by 2022, should the IMF refuse to renegotiate the debt with Macri's successor.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
International Macri Fund: IMF approves another $5.4 billion for Argentina (Original Post) sandensea Jul 2019 OP
So the new temporary managing director taking Christine's place doesn't really approve of this Judi Lynn Jul 2019 #1
By the way, watched "The Panama Papers" on Hulu tonight & Macri's nasty face appeared multiple times Judi Lynn Jul 2019 #2
I liked it too. sandensea Jul 2019 #3
Outstanding commentary on the Argentine reporters. Without a doubt they DID serve as a pipeline Judi Lynn Jul 2019 #4

Judi Lynn

(160,449 posts)
1. So the new temporary managing director taking Christine's place doesn't really approve of this
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 06:42 AM
Jul 2019

and was pressured into it by Donald Trump because he wants the destructive President to be re-elected.

Horrific. Anyone who takes Trump's advice now is self-destructive.

What a catastrophe. If someone doesn't stop both Macri, and Trump, (and Bolsonaro) the Western Hemisphere is going to take a terrible blow which will take ages to overcome. The common person is simply damned now. Will these people actually have to die of old age, along with almost everyone who can even remember them, before rescue is possible?

October's just 2 1/2 months away, and it seems like a decade, at this point! When there has already been so much destruction, every tiny blow to the general population is unforgivable, and has a ferocious impact.

Very best wishes, and hope for protection for Alberto Fernández, and his running mate, Christina. May be people turn out in such great numbers there can be no mistake regarding who will win the election.

Judi Lynn

(160,449 posts)
2. By the way, watched "The Panama Papers" on Hulu tonight & Macri's nasty face appeared multiple times
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:52 AM
Jul 2019

Would recommend that documentary regarding the story as it started at a German newspaper, like the Watergate story grew when someone contacted Bernstein and Woodward at the Washington Post, and how it grew to keep a great group of international reporters working on it together until it was published.

Very creepy seeing Macri's awful face looming on the tv screen. Can't believe he's not in prison yet.

sandensea

(21,596 posts)
3. I liked it too.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 01:29 AM
Jul 2019

Not mentioned in the documentary, interestingly, was the ICIJ's description of the role of the right-wing pro-Macri daily La Nación - which was apparently brought in without anyone having the least idea of who they really are.

The ICIJ basically basically described the "Argentine contribution" thusly (and I'm paraphrasing):

The sheer level of teamwork cannot be overstated here, given that we had reporters from 100 news media outlets around the world working in 25 languages.

But there was exception: the reporters from Argentina (all from La Nación).

They contributed almost nothing, and instead continually pestered the rest with inquiries as to whether anything had been found on Cristina Kirchner, her family, or her former officials. They were very insistent.

We found nothing on her or her family in the Panama Papers, and next to nothing in regards to her former associates - and this really disappointed the Argentines, who basically spent the rest of the time to themselves, pouting.

Then Mauricio Macri's accounts, and those of his family came up. They were both numerous and sizable, with millions of dollars in some cases.

Naturally, we took our findings to them, expecting them to be interested and of course to help make sense of it for us (as many of these names were unfamiliar to non-Argentines).

They showed no interest at all.


All this is not only highly relevant to the Panama Papers story itself; but it's also very illustrative of the hyper-partisan (mainly right-wing) nature of most corporate media in Argentina.

Suffice it to say that the ICIJ should've sent the La Nación gang packing on the spot - not least because they were probably relaying information to Macri (not unlike the way Devin Nunes did with Cheeto).

They're just lucky the ICIJ seems to be reluctant to hurt feelings - a professional courtesy Clarín and La Nación certainly don't share.

Thanks again for your keen observations, Judi. Have a great Sunday!

Judi Lynn

(160,449 posts)
4. Outstanding commentary on the Argentine reporters. Without a doubt they DID serve as a pipeline
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 04:09 AM
Jul 2019

straight back to Macri, and they provided him with adequate warning to enable to set up his defenses to best muffle the message with the help of his allies at home.

He really didn't get the proper attention his actions would demand, did he?

Powerful monsters have their waterboys, their eager Nunes, hoping to advance themselves with the new regime.

It was deeply appreciated seeing how hard they struggled to find some kind of orts they could use against Cristina, and failing.
Hope it dawned on them that if the consortium didn't scare anything up to harm her, they would never be able to do it themselves.

Delighted to hear you already saw that outstanding documentary! So glad you shared your observations.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»International Macri Fund:...