Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(59,500 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:42 PM Jan 2012

Brown claiming credit for what really has been a long term Kerry action.

I was surprised with this article speaking of Brown and Kerry working to insure that New Englanders can get superbowl coverage on their cable and direct TV sources. Kerry seems to have done this every year since 2008. He also is the Chair of the Commerce committee's sub committee and has been involved in trying to get the companies to work this out without hurting people who want to see the game. Not to mention, he has contacts in the FCC - and Brown doesn't.

Yet, here is how the article is written:


Sens. Brown, Kerry intercede in DirecTV-Sunbeam dispute
January 23, 2012 — 11:42am ET | By Steve Donohue

While it's unlikely that Sunbeam Television would take the chance of blocking DirecTV (Nasdaq: DTV) subscribers from watching the feed of Super Bowl 46 on its NBC affiliate in Boston, Massachusetts Senators Scott Brown and John Kerry aren't taking any chances. With the New England Patriots set to play the New York Giants in the Feb. 5 championship game, the legislators are attempting to force the companies to settle the retransmission-consent dispute that has left Boston viewers without the feeds for Sunbeam's NBC affiliate WHDH-TV and The CW affiliate WLVI-TV since Jan. 13.

"I am concerned that my constituents in Boston have become leverage in a business negotiation," Sen. Brown wrote in a letter to DirecTV CEO Mike White and Sunbeam Television president Edmund Ansin on Friday. "It is outrageous that subscribers would pay hundreds of dollars a year for service and not get to watch

Read more: Sens. Brown, Kerry intercede in DirecTV-Sunbeam dispute - FierceCable http://www.fiercecable.com/story/sens-brown-kerry-intercede-directv-sunbeam-dispute/2012-01-23#ixzz1kItBsy7A

This may be because Brown's letter was written by him and him alone.

http://www.fiercecable.com/press-releases/brown-calls-directv-sunbeam-let-bostonians-watch-nbc-cw

The real industry source speaks of Kerry.

While most retrans deals in the latest round have been done without blackouts, the Sunbeam-DirecTV impasse has drawn a letter from Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to the FCC, asking it to step in, and while it is at it, complete the retrans rulemaking prompted partly by earlier, high-profile blackouts that drew congressional attention.
<snip>
Kerry pointed out that it was the third year in a row he has contacted the FCC about a retrans dispute, and urged it to complete its pending rulemaking on retrans reform.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/479368-Kerry_Pushes_FCC_to_Step_Into_DirecTV_Sunbeam_Dispute.php

Now, I don't think this is a big issue - and it is clear that Kerry is working from a knowledge of the past, policy and the players involved - and Brown is grandstanding. I hope that some point he is called on his grandstanding on more important issues - like when he lists - as bills that passed because of him - DADT and the ratification of the START treaty. In fact, I think that only Dodd/Frank passed with Brown and just 60 votes - and that was when he demanded the banks get a $19 billion gift.



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Mass

(27,315 posts)
1. Of course, he is. He would be silly not to.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:50 PM
Jan 2012

In addition, he can grandstand as much as he wants now, with the new agreement Warren and him signed. It is not the media that are going to say he lies (The Globe already presents that as a major Brown's victory).

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2012/01/23/scott-brown-elizabeth-warren-battle-for-campaign-public-relations-high-ground/eJxIEQ744zXtJ4htMkQf4O/story.html

Submariner

(12,502 posts)
2. Screw right wing WHDH-TV
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jan 2012

I spoke to DTV this morning and requested that they link the WHDH-TV subscribers to channels 392 (WNBC NY) or (393 KNBC LA) for the Super Bowl game. The scum at Sunbeam want to raise their charge rate by 300% to DTV, which of course would be passed off to subscribers.

Keep the blackout going DTV.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
3. Which of our TV channel is not RW? For my understanding, does that affect
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:10 PM
Jan 2012

people who do not have cable or only those who have cable? Not that it makes it better. It seems that each year, the same type of problems arises.

Submariner

(12,502 posts)
4. WBZ doesn't have the Fox feel that channels 5 & 7 have, to me anyway
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:49 PM
Jan 2012

I just switched away from Comcast cable to Direct TV satellite, so this is the first station blackout I've experienced. I don't know if Comcast is caught up in this Sunbeam stink, and living on the Cape in a valley, I don't think a rabbit ear antenna would work for me.

This may be just a satellite TV provider issue, seperate from cable.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
5. With Jon Keller, it seems even worse to me. They all get on my nerves by their lavish admiration of
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jan 2012

our junior senator and disdain of everybody else.

Sometimes, I watch the local news on Fox 25, because at least, I know what to expect and they are more interesting at the local level (yes, they are big idiots too and it is Fox).

Submariner

(12,502 posts)
6. You're right, Keller would make a good Fox dork
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jan 2012

I forgot about him because I channel surf when his puss shows up on my TV screen. I have liked Jack Williams which dovetails into the CBS evening news, which I prefer over ABC/NBC nightly news.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Brown claiming credit for...