HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Gender & Orientation » Men's Group (Group) » This message was self-del...

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 03:16 PM

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Warren DeMontague) on Mon Feb 18, 2013, 05:29 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

19 replies, 10571 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply This message was self-deleted by its author (Original post)
Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 OP
caseymoz Jul 2012 #1
loli phabay Aug 2012 #9
caseymoz Aug 2012 #10
4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #2
Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #3
loli phabay Aug 2012 #7
Bonobo Jul 2012 #4
4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #5
Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #6
loli phabay Aug 2012 #8
4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #11
sxyliberal Feb 2013 #12
Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #13
sxyliberal Feb 2013 #16
lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #18
Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #19
lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #14
Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #15
lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #17

Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:43 PM

1. Notice that they see her in underwear . . .


When she's clearly not in underwear? They also say she must be a tranny. This is similar to what goes on when the antis see a pornographic picture. They'll see terror in the pornstar's eyes. They'll say that there's someone holding a gun off screen, and so on. It's always biased toward making the image, or the circumstances where it was taken, worse.

That's why I think there's something else going on here besides simple ideological disagreement or principled objection. When the expressed perceptions radically differ from the image shown, always toward something more licentiousness, that's when I begin to question whether their midbrains aren't pulling some tricks on their unconscious. I begin to doubt whether they can even be rational about it, feminism or not.

I also think they're just another generation of censorious prudes with a different terminology. Same goals. Same justifications for the goals. Different vocabulary.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to caseymoz (Reply #1)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:18 PM

9. there seems to be a lot of transphonia and hatred amongst some of the more strident feminists

 

Probuably due to the sexual attractiveness aspect. A lot of trans are exceptionally attractive and knew it and hype it and i think a lot of less attractive women resent the fact that they are literally blown out the water and end up hating what they see as competition.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loli phabay (Reply #9)

Thu Aug 2, 2012, 02:04 AM

10. Don't know if it's the principal reason.

Last edited Thu Aug 2, 2012, 07:59 AM - Edit history (1)

She's not a trans. (Excuse me for previous usage. I never knew until recently that "trannie" is insulting. I thought it utterly accepted.) One poster lays that innuendo. I've never noticed trans as being greatly attractive, though I'll admit there may be cases that I can't tell the difference, without the obvious.

Jealousy can be a component, but I really think there's something else driving it. What I would call "sexual nausea."

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Sun Jul 29, 2012, 05:32 PM

2. On the one hand you have millions of years of evolution

 

that tell us to notice how each other looks and think about sex a lot. It is ingrained in our genes and our culture (get rid of our culture and start over blank and the same basic principles would emerge again spontaneously).

On the other hand you have feminists claiming we really aren't interested in looking at each other or sex that it's entirely forced upon us.

Well best of luck rad-fems, overturning all that evolution. It's going to be an uphill battle.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #2)


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:11 PM

7. maybe its just that pic but she looks nuts and i mean scarey nuts

 

In a kind of bride of a brian may frankenstein way.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #2)

Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:32 PM

4. Quite right. Look at this monkey/ape "objectification"!

I can't believe how these monkeys and apes objectify women when they are in estrus. They reduce their women to their genital swelling!

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bonobo (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 30, 2012, 02:54 PM

5. Dat ass

 



/I mean it's all those magazines and ads and movies that condition apes to be at all interested in the physical characteristics of other apes. "Naturally" they only care about each other's personality. Sex is the furthest thing from their minds.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)


Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:14 PM

8. easy on the eyes sells. fact of life

 

Now would you buy something advertised by this lady before the lady shown below. Definetly yes unless it was cereal killer supplies.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to loli phabay (Reply #8)

Thu Aug 2, 2012, 04:00 PM

11. People are only interested in sexy members of the opposite sex because of patriarchal conditioning

 

no human being is naturally interested in sex (particularly PIV which is abhorrent and devastating to women).

Just look at chimps. So like humans but free from the grips of the patriarchy. They aren't interested in sex. They don't fornicate for any reason other than procreation. And they certainly don't care for elaborate sexual displays from their females.

Nope. Humans are the only primates that seem to be interested in sex. And also the only ones in the gripe of the dread Patriarchy. Coincidence?

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 04:57 AM

12. Please delete

Mind deleting this thread as this is my photo? Thanks!

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sxyliberal (Reply #12)


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #13)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:06 PM

16. Yes, it's me.

It is actually me. I'm suffering grief about my photo appearing on google images by my husband. I'm currently doing an internship in DC and trying to get all traces of me off from the interwebs. Hope you can understand, and thanks for coming to my defense.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sxyliberal (Reply #16)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:19 PM

18. Welcome to DU. n/t

 

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sxyliberal (Reply #16)


Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 07:57 PM

14. The wordpress blog in the link is published as "private" i.e. it's a dead link.

 

When I go to a trade show, I'm not impressed at vendors who hire bathing-suit booth babes to move the product.

Frankly, that feeling doesn't go away when the product being sold is philosophy and ideology.

Hey, I'm human and I'm sure subliminal signals attract me to a variety of products and messages, but those signals should be more sophisticated than "Read my blog... because boobs!"

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #14)


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #15)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:10 PM

17. I see what you're saying.

 

I agree it's prudent to verify that it's really the owner of the site before reacting.

And I also understand the blogger's point in the context of progressive puritans and conservative juvenile jackassery.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink