Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,067 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:59 AM Dec 2014

New G20 Rules: Cyprus-Style Bail-Ins to Hit Depositors and Pensioners


New G20 Rules: Cyprus-Style Bail-Ins to Hit Depositors and Pensioners

Tuesday, 02 December 2014 10:17
By Ellen Brown, The Web of Debt Blog | News Analysis


On the weekend of November 16, the G20 leaders whisked into Brisbane, posed for their photo ops, approved some proposals, made a show of roundly disapproving of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and whisked out again. It was all so fast, they may not have known what they were endorsing when they rubber-stamped the Financial Stability Board’s “Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution,” which completely changes the rules of banking.

Russell Napier, writing in ZeroHedge, called it “the day money died.” In any case, it may have been the day deposits died as money. Unlike coins and paper bills, which cannot be written down or given a “haircut,” says Napier, deposits are now “just part of commercial banks’ capital structure.” That means they can be “bailed in” or confiscated to save the megabanks from derivative bets gone wrong.

Rather than reining in the massive and risky derivatives casino, the new rules prioritize the payment of banks’ derivatives obligations to each other, ahead of everyone else. That includes not only depositors, public and private, but the pension funds that are the target market for the latest bail-in play, called “bail-inable” bonds.

“Bail in” has been sold as avoiding future government bailouts and eliminating too big to fail (TBTF). But it actually institutionalizes TBTF, since the big banks are kept in business by expropriating the funds of their creditors.

It is a neat solution for bankers and politicians, who don’t want to have to deal with another messy banking crisis and are happy to see it disposed of by statute. But a bail-in could have worse consequences than a bailout for the public. If your taxes go up, you will probably still be able to pay the bills. If your bank account or pension gets wiped out, you could wind up in the street or sharing food with your pets. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/news/item/27754-new-g20-rules-cyprus-style-bail-ins-to-hit-depositors-and-pensioners




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New G20 Rules: Cyprus-Style Bail-Ins to Hit Depositors and Pensioners (Original Post) marmar Dec 2014 OP
Thank you for posting this article. I do not understand why there is so snappyturtle Dec 2014 #1

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
1. Thank you for posting this article. I do not understand why there is so
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 09:35 AM
Dec 2014

little notice by the public of the issue of 'bail-ins'. Ellen Brown, the author, has warned of this technique by the banking industry for some time. While the public has its head into issues dividing the nation the banksters have set up the pathway to cover their potential derivative losses. The FDIC is inadequately funded. Bail-ins have all ready occurred in foreign lands and can happen here. imho

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»New G20 Rules: Cyprus-Sty...